Bibliographic record
Abstract
Welcome back to our readers. Over the past year, the staff and Board of Directors of the Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) have been immersed in the mysterious inner workings of the publishing world. At the Paediatrics & Child Health vicennial (the official word for a 20-year anniversary), the CPS purchased the journal from our former publisher. You are reading our first issue as an Oxford University Press (OUP) journal. Since OUP published the first translation of the Bible to English (the King James Version), we have great confidence that this will be a long-term arrangement. Due to the foresight of Dr. Noni MacDonald, our founding editor, we have been able to retain our title and our respectable impact factor of 1.574; this at a time when many other Canadian subspecialty journals have recently lost both of these critical components. What do we aim to publish? Our goal is to feature manuscripts that update readers on the practical aspects of diagnosis or treatment of diseases in children and youth, demonstrate to them how to be formidable communicators and teachers or inspire them to work toward improving the lot of children. In addition to publishing CPS position statements and practice points and high-quality original research, we are looking for submissions for the following columns: The Critical Lens (Dr. Guido Filler, editor): Concise commentaries on topics that are relevant for child health. Paediatric Progress: How Should It Change Your Practice? (Dr. Eyal Cohen, editor): Summaries of recent developments that have practical implications for clinicians. A Picture Says a Thousand Words (Dr. Alexander Leung, editor): Images that pose a diagnostic dilemma or are dramatic illustrations of a condition. See Many, Do Many, and Teach Many (Dr. Mark Awuku, editor): Reports of medical education interventions with outcome data. The Path to High Quality Care (Dr. Guido Filler, editor): Quality improvement initiatives with outcome data or novel solutions to patient safety issues. The View From the Top (editor pending): Overviews or compilations of systematic reviews on different interventions for the same condition. Practical Tips for Paediatricians (editor pending): Practical strategies for diagnosis or management that are not published elsewhere. The Road Less Travelled – Rapid Reviews in Integrative Medicine (editor pending): High-quality systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine. To tell you a bit about myself, I am a paediatric infectious diseases physician at the Stollery Children’s Hospital in Edmonton and am proud of the fact that I completed my paediatric residency at British Columbia Children’s Hospital. My husband tells me that I constantly give people advice whether they want it or not, so feel free to contact me if you have questions for me or think that I too would benefit from unsolicited advice! I am very much looking forward to working with OUP and CPS in advocating for Canadian children and youth and educating child and youth health professionals across the country. To all of our readers, authors and peer reviewers, thank you for joining us as we begin the next 20 years of Paediatrics & Child Health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.052 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.038 | 0.042 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".