MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2602419262 · doi:10.1353/esc.2004.0048

Wilde Writings: Contextual Conditions ed. by Joseph Bristow

2004· article· en· W2602419262 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sarika Priyadarshini Bose

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueModernist Literature and Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRomanceBiographyMythologyPoliticsPersonaHistoryLiteratureArt historyArtLawHumanities

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Joseph Bristow, ed. Wilde Writings: Contextual Conditions. Toronto: University ofToronto Press, 2003. Pp. 334. $63.00 cloth. In this collection of essays drawn from papers first presented at the conference series “Oscar Wilde and the Culture of the Fin de Siècle” at the William Andrews Clark Memorial Library from January to May 1999, fourteen Wilde scholars significantly expand the existing contextual information on Wilde. Although some of the essays derive at least partly from previously published work, most represent new and ongoing work by such well-respected scholars as John Stokes, Ian Small, Kerry Powell, Peter Raby, Laurence Senelick and Josephine Guy. The collection aims to provide contextual information meant to extend scholarly readings of Wilde’s works, often demonstrating his indebtedness to a variety of genres such as women’s romance writing, New Woman writing, autobiography and socialist writing. The essays fall into four broad sections, each repre­ senting a contextual focus, namely: professional writing, political writing, aestheticism, and the performance of gender and sexuality. It is almost impossible to separate Wilde’s writing from his life. Even in his own lifetime he acquired an iconic status, a status that was possible because of the particular historical period in which he lived, when the explosion of the information era existed side by side with a culture of the unspoken. The myth of Wilde— the larger-than-life wit, homosexual, socialist, professional, etc.— has grown in the last one hundred years. In this collection Wilde scholars attempt to look beyond this mythic persona to the cultural soil in which his genius had roots. They do not ignore Wilde’s life by any means; on the contrary, they use it as a reference point. But unlike early twentieth-century biographical criticism, this collection only uses aspects of W ilde’s life as starting points in order to theorize specific aspects of the work, focusing on his intellectual life rather than on the sensational dramas of his life. The wide range of his reading and the range of the genres of his writing form the contexts examined in this book, but the contextual awareness in these essays is twofold. Several scholars preface their main arguments about the contexts of textual production with an acknowledgement of the context of modern scholarly criticism itself, of the deceptiveness of received perceptions about Wilde and about textual analysis in general. For example, in his essay “Master Wood’s Profession: Wilde and the Sub­ culture of Homosexual Blackmail in the Victorian Theatre,” Laurence Senelick uses the scholarly furore over the mistaken identification of the 208 IBose “Salome” photograph in Richard Ellmann’s 1987 biography of Wilde to warn against less than solid theories of cross-dressing, while Josephine Guy alerts readers to the common assumption that the number of textual revisions signals the degree of seriousness and significance of a work. The essayists try to pinpoint exact historical moments and social contexts to unpack the process of Wilde’s arrival at the creative product. This is not just a search for obscure sources, but an attempt to identify the springs of Wilde’s conflicting and paradoxical philosophies. The slippery quality of Wilde, a scholarly truism, is acknowledged here as scholars examine the varied facets of his experiences and of influences upon him, which, as it is implied by this collection, were possible only at a certain historical moment. Joseph Bristow’s examination of the caricatures of Wilde that proliferated in popular magazines in the 1880s and 1890s attempts to understand the tension between acceptance and repudiation, the accep­ tance implied by the celebrity status of Wilde, and the rejection evident in the material of the caricatures themselves, arising from Wilde’s blatant and consistent self-promotion and his self-conscious persona. Like Peter Raby, Bristow attempts to articulate the essence of Wilde’s modernism, but Raby and Bristow define it differently. To Bristow, Wilde’s modernism lies in his self-fashioning, but to Raby, it is the insincerity and superficiality of social life, which he claims catapults Wilde into the angry dramas of Orton and Osborne as well as the postmodern deconstructionism of Stoppard. In locating Wilde’s modernism in these areas, Raby and Bristow affirm...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,522
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,696

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,247
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetModernist Literature and CriticismTravaux en français237 207