Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This report, which replaces CRS Report RL31051, provides updated information on interstate shipment of municipal solid waste (MSW).Since the late 1980s, Congress has considered, but not enacted, numerous bills that would allow states to impose restrictions on interstate waste shipments, a step the Constitution prohibits in the absence of congressional authorization.Over this period, there has been a continuing interest in knowing how much waste is being shipped across state lines for disposal, and what states might be affected by proposed legislation.This report provides data useful in addressing these questions.Total interstate waste shipments continue to rise due to the closure of older local landfills and the increasing consolidation of the waste management industry.About 35 million tons of municipal solid waste crossed state lines for disposal in 2001, an increase of 9.4% over 2000.Waste imports have grown each year since CRS began tracking them in the early 1990s, and now represent 21.6% of all municipal solid waste disposed at landfills and waste combustion facilities.In the last eight years, reported imports have increased 141%.Pennsylvania remains, by far, the largest waste importer.The state received 10.7 million tons of municipal solid waste and 1.9 million tons of other nonhazardous waste from out of state in 2001, more than 30% of the national total for interstate shipments.Virginia, the second largest importer, received 4.1 million tons, 62% less than the amount received by Pennsylvania.Michigan, the third largest importer, imported 3.6 million tons of MSW in fiscal year 2001; waste imports to Michigan have doubled since 1999.Twenty-three states had increased imports in the current report -the largest increases occurring in Pennsylvania and Michigan.In all, eight states reported imports that exceeded one million tons.While waste imports increased overall, several states (including New Hampshire, South Carolina, Connecticut, Arizona, and Washington) reported sharp declines in waste imports.New York remains the largest exporter of waste, with New Jersey and Illinois in second and third place, respectively.Four states (New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and Maryland) account for more than half the national total of waste exports. 1 Legislation on interstate shipment of waste has been introduced in every Congress since the 100 th .In the 104 th Congress, the Senate passed S. 534.The bill would have granted states authority to restrict new shipments of municipal solid waste from out of state, if requested by an affected local government.In the 103 rd Congress, both the House and Senate passed interstate waste legislation (H.R. 4779 and S. 2345), but lack of agreement on common language prevented enactment.For a discussion of the issues addressed in these bills, see CRS Report RS20106, Interstate Waste Transport: Legislative Issues. 2 This report replaces Interstate Shipment of Municipal Solid Waste: 2001 Update, CRS Report RL31051.Earlier reports, now out of print but available directly from the author, were Interstate Shipment of Municipal Solid Waste: 2000 Update, CRS Report RL30409,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,013 | 0,017 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,016 | 0,013 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».