Comportamento do sono e desenvolvimento motor em crianças de 12 a 18 meses
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The health monitoring of the child in the first years of life is essential, since alterations in the neuromotor development and sleep behavior can be detected by the professionals, who ameliorate risk situations through early interventions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sleep behavior and motor development of the 12- to 18-month-old child using the Infant Sleep Questionnaire (ISQ) and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). To verify the association of the sociodemographic and educational variables of the caregiver and neonates with the final scores of the Infant Sleep Questionnaire (ISQ) - Brazilian version and AIMS. This cross-sectional and quantitative study was carried out at the Pediatric Outpatient Clinic of a reference hospital in Fortaleza, CE, Brazil, and at home. Its sample is made up of 50 children and 50 caregivers, from April to October 2014. Participants were approached by direct search of medical records or contact with parents and professionals of the service; For this purpose, an instrument for the characterization of the participants, ISQ - Brazilian version and AIMS, approved by the Research Ethics Committee under protocol No. 422.103. Most caregivers are female (92%), with a mean age of 29 years and the majority between 25-34 years (50%), stable union (44%). Among females, females predominated (58%), gestational age between 35-41 weeks, born full term (84%), between 12 and 13 months of chronological age (36%), mean of 14.58 Months. The prevalence of normality (score <12) in 29 (58%) children was determined according to the final ISQ (Brazilian version), in children's sleep behavior classification. Most caregivers (62%) reported that their children had no sleep problems. There was a significant association between the final ISQ score (Brazilian version) and the criterion of the evaluator (p = 0.000). Regarding the motor development evaluation, the AIMS final scores resulted in normal (70%), suspect (20%) and atypical (10%) performance. A statistically significant association between final ISQ scores - Brazilian version with caregiver's age (p = 0.022) and Apgar scores at the fifth minute of life (p = 0.049); Final AIMS scores with gestational age (p = 0.013) and chronological age (p = 0.001). The final AIMS scores and final ISQ scores (Brazilian version) did not present statistical significance (p = 0.240). It was concluded that sleep behavior and gross motor development at the age of 12 to 18 months were not directly associated with most variables. However, it is emphasized that parental, environmental and organic factors are active determinants in this process, and this relationship with adequate sleep allows the brain activity to act in favor of development.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,014 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».