Abstract B30: Talazoparib efficacy is enhanced by noncytotoxic doses of temozolomide-mediated DNA damage in prostate cancer cell lines
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Purpose: To investigate the effects of talazoparib alone and in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) on prostate cancer cells Introduction: Talazoparib is a potent, orally bioavailable, small molecule inhibitor of PARP (poly-ADP ribose polymerase) enzyme activity that also traps PARP protein onto DNA at sites of DNA damage; both activities result in cancer cell death (Murai et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13:433-43). Talazoparib is currently under investigation for clinical activity in patients who have locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer with germline BRCA mutations (EMBRACA; Clinical Trials.gov; NCT01945775). In the current nonclinical study, talazoparib demonstrated potent antitumor effects on androgen receptor (AR)-positive prostate cancer cells expressing both full length AR (LNCaP cells) as well as the androgen-independent splice variant, AR-V7 (22RV1 cells), when used either as a single agent or in combination with low, noncytotoxic concentrations of TMZ, a DNA alkylating therapeutic. Methods: Viability of prostate cancer cells (LNCaP and 22RV1 cells) after 7 days of treatment was measured by Cell Titer Glo (Promega) after treatment with vehicle, talazoparib, TMZ or a combination of the two. DNA damage was determined by immunofluorescence against gH2AX (EMD Millipore), and the amount of PARP trapped on DNA, determined by Western Blot analysis of chromatin probed with antibodies specific for PARP. Cellular homeostasis was determined by flow cytometry analysis for cell cycle stage, and apoptosis indicated by Annexin V staining (BD Pharmingen) or caspase activation with Caspase Glo (Promega) assays. Nucleotide adducts, N7 methyl-2'-deoxyguanosine (N7-MedG) and O6-Methyl-2'-deoxyguanosine (O6-MedG), from 1-, 2- and 4-hour TMZ-treated calf thymus DNA and genomic DNA from LNCaP cells treated with TMZ were detected after DNA hydrolysis and quantitated by LC-mass spectrometry in multiple reaction monitoring mode. Results: Talazoparib treatment resulted in a concentration-dependent inhibition of cell viability in LNCaP (AR wildtype) and 22RV1 (AR-V7) cells. Talazoparib's antitumor effects were greatly enhanced when combined with noncytotoxic TMZ concentrations. In a cell-free study using calf thymus DNA, TMZ generated both N7-MedG and O6-MedG DNA adducts, with the N7-MedG being more abundant than the O6-MedG. Analysis of DNA from LNCaP cells treated with TMZ generated detectable N7-MedG DNA adducts. Low, noncytotoxic concentrations of TMZ potentiated the effects of talazoparib on prostate cancer cell viability independent of AR variant status. Treatment with talazoparib alone and in combination with TMZ was associated with increased gH2AX staining (DNA damage) and enhanced PARP-DNA trapping complexes. The combination treatment also induced an increase in apoptotic cells at early time points. Conclusion: Talazoparib is cytotoxic to prostate cancer cells as a single agent in nonclinical cell based models. Herein, we demonstrate that combining noncytotoxic doses of TMZ with talazoparib improves efficacy in killing of LNCaP and 22RV1 cells. The increased efficacy corresponds with increased DNA-damage and increased trapped PARP-DNA complexes. Low, noncytotoxic doses of TMZ are shown to generate DNA damage sites in vitro and in treated LNCaP cells, providing a mechanistic basis for the combination effect of talazoparib and TMZ. Together, these nonclinical data provide scientific rationale for a clinical trial strategy of combining talazoparib with low, noncytotoxic doses of TMZ to enhance efficacy in prostate cancer. Citation Format: Jeffrey N. Lindquist, Vernon T. Phan, Eduardo Riquelme, Kakoli Mukherjee, Olivia Farías, Ashu Gupta, Mohd Raja, Roopa Rai, Hirdesh Uppal, Andrew A. Protter. Talazoparib efficacy is enhanced by noncytotoxic doses of temozolomide-mediated DNA damage in prostate cancer cell lines [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on DNA Repair: Tumor Development and Therapeutic Response; 2016 Nov 2-5; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2017;15(4_Suppl):Abstract nr B30.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».