Wahman, Jessica. Narrative Naturalism: An Alternative Framework for Philosophy of Mind
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
WAHMAN, Jessica. Narrative Naturalism: An Alternative Framework for Philosophy of Mind. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books, 2015. xv + 191 pp. Cloth, $85.00--In the early twentieth century, George Santayana was the most prominent of the new American naturalist philosophers, only later eclipsed by Dewey. His poetic materialism defied inherited categories and open new avenues for thought. But since mid-century he has been largely absent from debates about that characteristically American product, nonreductive naturalism. Jessica Wahman has organized a sophisticated and well-written Santayanan counterattack. Her aim is to show that Santayana's naturalism is suited to contribute to current debates over reductionism and the philosophy of mind. Wahman rejects mechanism and physicalism as philosophical misinterpretations of the natural sciences. She employs careful arguments in epistemology and neuroscience to display Santayana's scheme as an alternative to both reductive physicalism and emergence. Wahman begins by mobilizing Santayana's pragmatism as a theory of knowing which recognizes the relational and interest-related nature of scientific theorizing, bringing construction, metaphor, and narrative into our knowledge of nature. The objects of our consciousness (essences, we will see below) are not material things or aspects thereof, nor are they copies of such things or properties of consciousness. Human (and animal) knowing does not picture or correspond to its objects: it creates a sensory-cognitive model in response to the organism's somatic transaction with the material environment as a pragmatic, relational gambit for achieving its needs. We inevitably, and legitimately, hold our explanatory hypotheses valid of material existence by animal faith. Santanyana was a materialist, unlike almost all the other American thinkers at the time (the Canadian R. W. Sellars being his lone companion here). Wahman points out that for him matter is existence itself, and is refractory to human control and cognition. We can form valid hypotheses about it, but its contingency is never exhausted. In contrast, consciousness or spirit exists outside matter. This may appear to conflict with most current forms of naturalism, not to mention neuroscience. But for Santayana the psyche, the process of all experience, thought, and feeling, along with the life functions of the organism, is part of the material world. Psyche is causal, but consciousness is not. This is consonant both with the neuroscientific view of consciousness as a higher-order processing of sensory-motor material, and, as Wahman points out, psychoanalytic theory. Spirit's objects, which it intuits, are essences, the characters of things. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».