MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2607608830

Wahman, Jessica. Narrative Naturalism: An Alternative Framework for Philosophy of Mind

2016· article· en· W2607608830 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lawrence Cahoone

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œreview of metaphysics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Philosophy and Thought
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNaturalismEpistemologyPhilosophyPhysicalismMaterialismConsciousnessReductionismNarrativeMetaphysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WAHMAN, Jessica. Narrative Naturalism: An Alternative Framework for Philosophy of Mind. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books, 2015. xv + 191 pp. Cloth, $85.00--In the early twentieth century, George Santayana was the most prominent of the new American naturalist philosophers, only later eclipsed by Dewey. His poetic materialism defied inherited categories and open new avenues for thought. But since mid-century he has been largely absent from debates about that characteristically American product, nonreductive naturalism. Jessica Wahman has organized a sophisticated and well-written Santayanan counterattack. Her aim is to show that Santayana's naturalism is suited to contribute to current debates over reductionism and the philosophy of mind. Wahman rejects mechanism and physicalism as philosophical misinterpretations of the natural sciences. She employs careful arguments in epistemology and neuroscience to display Santayana's scheme as an alternative to both reductive physicalism and emergence. Wahman begins by mobilizing Santayana's pragmatism as a theory of knowing which recognizes the relational and interest-related nature of scientific theorizing, bringing construction, metaphor, and narrative into our knowledge of nature. The objects of our consciousness (essences, we will see below) are not material things or aspects thereof, nor are they copies of such things or properties of consciousness. Human (and animal) knowing does not picture or correspond to its objects: it creates a sensory-cognitive model in response to the organism's somatic transaction with the material environment as a pragmatic, relational gambit for achieving its needs. We inevitably, and legitimately, hold our explanatory hypotheses valid of material existence by animal faith. Santanyana was a materialist, unlike almost all the other American thinkers at the time (the Canadian R. W. Sellars being his lone companion here). Wahman points out that for him matter is existence itself, and is refractory to human control and cognition. We can form valid hypotheses about it, but its contingency is never exhausted. In contrast, consciousness or spirit exists outside matter. This may appear to conflict with most current forms of naturalism, not to mention neuroscience. But for Santayana the psyche, the process of all experience, thought, and feeling, along with the life functions of the organism, is part of the material world. Psyche is causal, but consciousness is not. This is consonant both with the neuroscientific view of consciousness as a higher-order processing of sensory-motor material, and, as Wahman points out, psychoanalytic theory. Spirit's objects, which it intuits, are essences, the characters of things. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œreview of metaphysicsSame topicClassical Philosophy and ThoughtFrench-language works237,207