MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2610317696 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.r225-16

Sediment Transport in Grass Swales

2006· article· en· W2610317696 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yukio Nara, Robert E. Pitt

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesWater Environment Research Foundation
Mots-clésSwaleSedimentSediment transportEnvironmental scienceGeologyHydrology (agriculture)GeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringEcologySurface runoffBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Grass swales are vegetated open channels that collect and transport stormwater runoff.They are often used as an alternative to concrete gutters to transport runoff along streets due to their low cost.However, they also offer several advantages in stormwater quality management, especially in their ability to infiltrate runoff.This chapter describes another benefit of grass swales: their ability to trap particulates during low flows.A series of detailed laboratory tests were conducted to describe sediment transport processes for stormwater grass swales.Field verifications of these processes are also described in this chapter.As expected, runoff hydraulics, especially depth of flow, along with swale length, affect the transport of particulates of different sizes.Shallow flows (less than the grass height) provided consistently high removal rates, while deeper flows (and especially along with relatively low sediment concentrations) had poorer sediment trapping abilities.Obviously, long swales and large particle sizes are an effective combination, but the smallest particles are likely to be effectively transported along most swales.There appeared to be equilibrium concentrations for different particle sizes that were not further reduced, irrespective of swale length, likely associated with combinations of scour of Sediment Transport in Grass Swales material from the underlying soil or of previously trapped sediment, and the carrying capacity of the water. MethodologyThe Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Alabama has been conducting research investigating the effectiveness of grass swales for stormwater sediment transport for several years.This research was initially supported by the Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) (Johnson, et al. 2003) and more recently by the University Transportation Center of Alabama (UTCA).The aims of this research are to understand the effects of different variables affecting sediment transport in grass swales, especially considering different particle sizes, swale features, and flow conditions.Controlled tests were conducted using specially constructed indoor grass swales and test solutions having known concentrations of sediment with different particle sizes.The test solutions used particles of sieved sands (locally acquired) and commercially-sized silica (from U.S. Silica Co.).The indoor swales were adjusted for different slopes, and had three different grasses.Two series of indoor experiments were conducted.The first series were exploratory in nature to identify the most important variables affecting sediment transport, while the second series examined these variables in more detail and were used to develop a sediment transport model.The first series of tests examined grass type, slope, swale length, time since the beginning of the flow, flow rate, particle size, and sediment concentration.The second series of tests focused on fewer grass types, had less variability in sediment concentrations, and composited samples over the complete test period.The sediment transport processes described in this chapter were derived during the second series of experiments.The second series of indoor swale experiments included analyzing 108 samples for turbidity, total solids, total suspended solids, total dissolved solids, and particle size distribution.The results of the indoor swale experiments were verified during monitoring at an outdoor grass swale located adjacent to the Tuscaloosa (Alabama, U.S.A.) City Hall, during actual storm events.The outdoor swale tests included collecting and analyzing 69 samples during 13 storm events from August to December 2004.These samples were analyzed for turbidity, total solids, total suspended solids, total dissolved solids, and particle size distribution.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,033

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,201
Écart entre enseignants0,192 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Water Management ModelingMême sujetHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesTravaux en français237 207