MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2612252842 · doi:10.1097/01.cot.0000520166.95325.d1

First Drug Approved for Merkel Cell Carcinoma Achieves Strong Response

2017· article· en· W2612252842 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peggy Eastman

Notice bibliographique

RevueOncology Times · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePolyomavirus and related diseases
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMerkel cell carcinomaAvelumabMedicineMerkel cell polyomavirusMerkel cellCancerDermatologyChemotherapyMelanomaOncologyCarcinomaInternal medicineImmunotherapyCancer researchNivolumab

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Merkel cell carcinoma; AACR: Merkel cell carcinoma; AACRWASHINGTON, D.C.—Up until recently, patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) had little hope of a durable treatment for their rare, aggressive skin condition, which is considered more deadly than melanoma. Although stage IV MCC, which affects about 2,000 newly diagnosed U.S. patients each year, can be treated with chemotherapy, the responses are seldom durable, said Howard L. Kaufman, MD, Surgical Oncologist at Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Professor of Surgery and Medicine at the Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. So the approval of avelumab for advanced MCC by the FDA March 23, 2017, was good news for patients and oncologists, said Kaufman at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), held April 1-5. This is the first-ever drug approved by the FDA for MCC; it was approved for treatment of metastatic MCC in adults and pediatric patients 12 years and older. The agency's accelerated approval is contingent upon confirmatory trials. Patients With Merkel Cell “This is a terrible disease,” said Kaufman at a news briefing at the AACR meeting. “Avelumab monotherapy showed durable antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients with metatastic Merkel cell carcinoma that progressed after chemotherapy.” Avelumab targets the PD-L1 protein; the impetus for studying patients with MCC came from studies showing that PD-L1 is found in tumor samples from almost all patients who have MCC. It is “often associated with Merkel cell polyomavirus infection” and “exposure to UV light, advanced age, and immunosuppression elevate risk,” noted Kaufman. Because it is so rare, “this is a disease that oncologists don't see so much,” said Kaufman. Therefore, it is important to get the word out so patients can have access to avelumab. “MCC is an orphan disease,” commented briefing moderator Suzanne Topalian, MD, Director of the Melanoma Program at the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore. “This is a disease primarily of older patients,” with an average age of about 73. Although the immune systems of older people are frequently less competent, Topalian noted that the response of older patients to avelumab was good and it was relatively well-tolerated. In fact, Kaufman said older patients responded just as well as younger patients to avelumab and, interestingly, they seemed to have somewhat fewer side effects than younger patients. “I think that age in and of itself should not be a contraindication for use of the drug,” he noted. The most common side effects were fatigue and infusion reactions. Results With Avelumab Kaufman and his colleagues enrolled 88 patients with metastatic MCC who had progressed after treatment with chemotherapy in a multi-center, phase II clinical trial. All patients on the trial received 10 mg/kg avelumab as an IV infusion over 1 hour every 2 weeks. As shown in previously reported data, 28 patients had a response after 10.4 months of follow-up. Eight had a complete response and 20 had partial responses. The trial demonstrated that avelumab works in patients with highly mutated cancers typically caused by UV light and also in those with minimally mutated tumors triggered by the Merkel cell polyomavirus. At the AACR meeting, Kaufman reported on a longer follow-up; the number of MCC patients with a response increased to 29, for an overall response rate of 33 percent after a median of 16.4 months, which Kaufman called “quite remarkable.” The number of patients with a complete response increased to 10, while another patient newly recorded to have a response had a complete response. When the data cutoff time occurred, 21 of the responses were ongoing and the median duration of response had not been reached. Kaufman and his team estimate that 74 percent of patients with metastatic MCC will have a response to avelumab that lasts 1 year or longer. He added that “maturing progression-free and overall survival data suggest long-term benefit in a proportion of patients.” During his presentation, Kaufman said avelumab is also being evaluated for other cancers. Asked by Oncology Times what those are, he named bladder, lung, gastric, ovarian, and renal cancers. “It does look like there is activity against other cancers,” said Kaufman. But while avelumab is being studied in a variety of other cancers, he emphasized it has not been approved for such indications in the U.S., Canada, or elsewhere. In a statement made available at the AACR meeting, an Oregon MCC patient treated with avelumab described what the drug has meant to him. Tom Judd received his first infusion of avelumab more than 2 years ago under the care of one of Kaufman's study co-authors, Paul Nghiem, MD, PhD, Director of the Skin Oncology Program at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and Head of Dermatology at the University of Washington. Judd's MCC, which initially appeared as a pimple-like bump on his face in 2012, had spread through his vital organs, and he and his family were preparing for a dismal prognosis. But 6 weeks after Judd received his initial infusion of avelumab, a scan showed that 35 percent of his tumor had disappeared, and today it is 90 percent gone. “I feel very lucky, if that's a word that can be used, that I'm living in this time and in this area that this can even happen,” said Judd, who feels well and enjoys working in his garden and babysitting his preschool-aged granddaughter. Judd still receives infusions of the drug every 2 weeks at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance. Nghiem called the latest response rates in the trial “extraordinarily durable,” and said such treatment responses are “unheard of.” Peggy Eastman is a contributing writer.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,247
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,498

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,312
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOncology TimesMême sujetPolyomavirus and related diseasesTravaux en français237 207