MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First Drug Approved for Merkel Cell Carcinoma Achieves Strong Response

2017· article· en· W2612252842 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peggy Eastman

Bibliographic record

VenueOncology Times · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPolyomavirus and related diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMerkel cell carcinomaAvelumabMedicineMerkel cell polyomavirusMerkel cellCancerDermatologyChemotherapyMelanomaOncologyCarcinomaInternal medicineImmunotherapyCancer researchNivolumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Merkel cell carcinoma; AACR: Merkel cell carcinoma; AACRWASHINGTON, D.C.—Up until recently, patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) had little hope of a durable treatment for their rare, aggressive skin condition, which is considered more deadly than melanoma. Although stage IV MCC, which affects about 2,000 newly diagnosed U.S. patients each year, can be treated with chemotherapy, the responses are seldom durable, said Howard L. Kaufman, MD, Surgical Oncologist at Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Professor of Surgery and Medicine at the Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. So the approval of avelumab for advanced MCC by the FDA March 23, 2017, was good news for patients and oncologists, said Kaufman at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), held April 1-5. This is the first-ever drug approved by the FDA for MCC; it was approved for treatment of metastatic MCC in adults and pediatric patients 12 years and older. The agency's accelerated approval is contingent upon confirmatory trials. Patients With Merkel Cell “This is a terrible disease,” said Kaufman at a news briefing at the AACR meeting. “Avelumab monotherapy showed durable antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients with metatastic Merkel cell carcinoma that progressed after chemotherapy.” Avelumab targets the PD-L1 protein; the impetus for studying patients with MCC came from studies showing that PD-L1 is found in tumor samples from almost all patients who have MCC. It is “often associated with Merkel cell polyomavirus infection” and “exposure to UV light, advanced age, and immunosuppression elevate risk,” noted Kaufman. Because it is so rare, “this is a disease that oncologists don't see so much,” said Kaufman. Therefore, it is important to get the word out so patients can have access to avelumab. “MCC is an orphan disease,” commented briefing moderator Suzanne Topalian, MD, Director of the Melanoma Program at the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore. “This is a disease primarily of older patients,” with an average age of about 73. Although the immune systems of older people are frequently less competent, Topalian noted that the response of older patients to avelumab was good and it was relatively well-tolerated. In fact, Kaufman said older patients responded just as well as younger patients to avelumab and, interestingly, they seemed to have somewhat fewer side effects than younger patients. “I think that age in and of itself should not be a contraindication for use of the drug,” he noted. The most common side effects were fatigue and infusion reactions. Results With Avelumab Kaufman and his colleagues enrolled 88 patients with metastatic MCC who had progressed after treatment with chemotherapy in a multi-center, phase II clinical trial. All patients on the trial received 10 mg/kg avelumab as an IV infusion over 1 hour every 2 weeks. As shown in previously reported data, 28 patients had a response after 10.4 months of follow-up. Eight had a complete response and 20 had partial responses. The trial demonstrated that avelumab works in patients with highly mutated cancers typically caused by UV light and also in those with minimally mutated tumors triggered by the Merkel cell polyomavirus. At the AACR meeting, Kaufman reported on a longer follow-up; the number of MCC patients with a response increased to 29, for an overall response rate of 33 percent after a median of 16.4 months, which Kaufman called “quite remarkable.” The number of patients with a complete response increased to 10, while another patient newly recorded to have a response had a complete response. When the data cutoff time occurred, 21 of the responses were ongoing and the median duration of response had not been reached. Kaufman and his team estimate that 74 percent of patients with metastatic MCC will have a response to avelumab that lasts 1 year or longer. He added that “maturing progression-free and overall survival data suggest long-term benefit in a proportion of patients.” During his presentation, Kaufman said avelumab is also being evaluated for other cancers. Asked by Oncology Times what those are, he named bladder, lung, gastric, ovarian, and renal cancers. “It does look like there is activity against other cancers,” said Kaufman. But while avelumab is being studied in a variety of other cancers, he emphasized it has not been approved for such indications in the U.S., Canada, or elsewhere. In a statement made available at the AACR meeting, an Oregon MCC patient treated with avelumab described what the drug has meant to him. Tom Judd received his first infusion of avelumab more than 2 years ago under the care of one of Kaufman's study co-authors, Paul Nghiem, MD, PhD, Director of the Skin Oncology Program at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and Head of Dermatology at the University of Washington. Judd's MCC, which initially appeared as a pimple-like bump on his face in 2012, had spread through his vital organs, and he and his family were preparing for a dismal prognosis. But 6 weeks after Judd received his initial infusion of avelumab, a scan showed that 35 percent of his tumor had disappeared, and today it is 90 percent gone. “I feel very lucky, if that's a word that can be used, that I'm living in this time and in this area that this can even happen,” said Judd, who feels well and enjoys working in his garden and babysitting his preschool-aged granddaughter. Judd still receives infusions of the drug every 2 weeks at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance. Nghiem called the latest response rates in the trial “extraordinarily durable,” and said such treatment responses are “unheard of.” Peggy Eastman is a contributing writer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncology TimesSame topicPolyomavirus and related diseasesFrench-language works237,207