Notice bibliographique
Résumé
17 JULY 1908 * 11 AUGUST 2007 ALEXANDER HAMILTON LEIGHTON passed away n August 2007 shortly after his ninety-ninth birthday. During his long life, he was dedicated to written word as a way of communicating not only results of research but also products of thought and interpretation. At age of eighteen, he published his first scientific paper based on his observation of porcupines (1). He authored, co-authored, or edited fourteen books, including a novel (2). He published a long list of journal articles, two of which were posthumous (3, 4). He was a man of science and letters who had a profound appreciation of nature and of human beings in all their biological, personal, and cultural expressions. He was trained in biology as an undergraduate, then in neurophysiology, medicine, psychiatry, and, lastly, anthropology. In research, he was dedicated to work that would produce what Benjamin Franklin called knowledge, useful especially in terms of understanding mental illness, cultural conflict, and social disadvantage. A soft-spoken man with a keen sense of humor, Alec was an excellent raconteur whose stories were often enhanced by an Irish brogue based on ties to Ireland, where his parents had been born. He has been described as a Renaissance man, as the father of psychiatric epidemiology, and as a banner carrier for interdisciplinary research and teaching. Best known for Stirling County Study, Alec instigated this endeavor in 1948. It is a psychiatric epidemiologic investigation of a typical general population in Atlantic Canada. It was begun when there were but a handful of such studies. Now, with hundreds of such investigations having been and still being carried out, it is longest such study in North America and is still ongoing under leadership of his wife and colleague of many years, Jane M. Murphy, Ph.D., professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, professor of epidemiology at Harvard School of Public Health, and professor of psychiatry in faculty of medicine of Dalhousie University. Alec received a B.A. in 1932 from Princeton, an M.A. in 1934 from Cambridge, and an M.D. in 1936 from Johns Hopkins, where he was strongly influenced by internationally renowned psychiatrist Adolph Meyer. Meyer's view that psychopathology derives from multiple sources, including life experiences, left a permanent and indelible mark on Alec's thinking. He spoke often of being especially proud to have been one of Meyer's last chief residents. During his training at Johns Hopkins, Alec married his first wife, Dorothea Cross, who also became a psychiatrist. Together they were granted a Social Science Research Fellowship to participate in anthropological seminars at Columbia University and then to be on leave during spring of 1940 to conduct fieldwork among Navajo of New Mexico and Yupik Eskimos of St. Lawrence Island, Alaska. The Navajo work had a strong influence on their future undertakings, especially Dorothea's (5-9). As a psychiatric resident, Alec became interested in photography as a tool for accurate description, an interest that found expression in his work among patients, among Navajo and Yupik, and also later as an aid in community development (10-12). As a U.S. Navy Medical Corps reservist, Alec was called to service on day after bombing of Pearl Harbor. He was soon transferred to Department of Interior to do a study of a Japanese Relocation Center. The purpose of this research, reported in The Governing of Men (13), was to observe how a group of evacuees reorganized social fabric of their human relationships so as to function in an artificially created social environment. Next he was transferred to Washington to become chief of Foreign Morale Analysis Division (FMAD) in Office of War Information and was charged with mapping attitudes about surrender through Japanese press and such sources as prisoner-of-war diaries, as reported in Human Relations in a Changing World (14). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».