MP867TO THE ORIGINS OF RENOPROTECTIVE IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE: PAST AND PRESENT OF THE RENIN-ANGIOTENSIN SYSTEM
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The history of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has for 120 years. In 1897 the Scandinavian physiologies from the University of Stockholm R. Tigerstedt and his assistant P. G. Bergmann, found that intravenous administration of the renal extract causes an increase in blood pressure in rabbits. They proved that the kidneys produce soluble protein - they called it renin - which is responsible for the increase in pressure. R. Tigerstedt, reported on their summer opening at an international conference in Moscow, but the report has not caused interest. The Professor stopped his studies, and P.G. Bergman began to practice medicine. The scientific world forgot about the opening of the first element of the RAS - renin almost 40 years. METHODS: In 1934, a Canadian scientist who has worked in California, H. Goldblatt, published their findings in the Journal of Experimental Medicine. He caused hypertension in dogs by clamping the renal artery, but the clamping of the splenic and femoral arteries did not give such effect. Like their Scandinavian predecessors H. Goldblatt concluded: ischemia of the kidneys stimulates the secretion of "special" substances with vasoconstrictor action, but this idea, as in the case of R. Tigerstedt and P. G. Bergman, aroused only skepticism. After a year, two independent groups of researchers - first under E. Braun-Menendez in the Medical School of the University Buenos Aires (Argentina), the other under the leadership of I. H. Page from Eli-Lilly Laboratories in Indianapolis (USA) repeated the experiment G. Goldblatt and demonstrated renal secretion of a pressor agent similar to renin. In the following years, both groups of researchers isolated a new substance from the venous blood of the ischemic kidney. It was a peptide of eight amino acids, which Argentinean researchers called it angiotonin, American researcher’s - hypertensin. Twenty years later, scientists came to the conclusion about the uniform nature of the obtained substance and called it angiotensin. RESULTS: Later L. Skeggs and his colleagues established the existence of two forms of angiotensin, and S. H. Ferreira highlighted the angiotensin-converting enzyme. So was open RAS, which are known at the present time, not only modulates arterial hypertension, but also affects the target organs, including the kidneys. The next step in the development of the doctrine of the RAS was the creation of the means of its pharmacological blockade. There were modern drugs that inhibit various parts of the RAS. The first representative was saralasin - receptor blocker to angiotensin II intravenous not found wide clinical application. A few years later developed the first drug class of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (captopril), after a decade and a half - non-peptide blocker of the receptors to angiotensin II (losartan), and later - indirect renin inhibitor (aliskiren). CONCLUSIONS: RAS plays an important role in the progression of chronic kidney disease, including renal transplant recipients, and its pharmacological blockade exerts renal protection effect and prevents lethal complications.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».