MP867TO THE ORIGINS OF RENOPROTECTIVE IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE: PAST AND PRESENT OF THE RENIN-ANGIOTENSIN SYSTEM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The history of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has for 120 years. In 1897 the Scandinavian physiologies from the University of Stockholm R. Tigerstedt and his assistant P. G. Bergmann, found that intravenous administration of the renal extract causes an increase in blood pressure in rabbits. They proved that the kidneys produce soluble protein - they called it renin - which is responsible for the increase in pressure. R. Tigerstedt, reported on their summer opening at an international conference in Moscow, but the report has not caused interest. The Professor stopped his studies, and P.G. Bergman began to practice medicine. The scientific world forgot about the opening of the first element of the RAS - renin almost 40 years. METHODS: In 1934, a Canadian scientist who has worked in California, H. Goldblatt, published their findings in the Journal of Experimental Medicine. He caused hypertension in dogs by clamping the renal artery, but the clamping of the splenic and femoral arteries did not give such effect. Like their Scandinavian predecessors H. Goldblatt concluded: ischemia of the kidneys stimulates the secretion of "special" substances with vasoconstrictor action, but this idea, as in the case of R. Tigerstedt and P. G. Bergman, aroused only skepticism. After a year, two independent groups of researchers - first under E. Braun-Menendez in the Medical School of the University Buenos Aires (Argentina), the other under the leadership of I. H. Page from Eli-Lilly Laboratories in Indianapolis (USA) repeated the experiment G. Goldblatt and demonstrated renal secretion of a pressor agent similar to renin. In the following years, both groups of researchers isolated a new substance from the venous blood of the ischemic kidney. It was a peptide of eight amino acids, which Argentinean researchers called it angiotonin, American researcher’s - hypertensin. Twenty years later, scientists came to the conclusion about the uniform nature of the obtained substance and called it angiotensin. RESULTS: Later L. Skeggs and his colleagues established the existence of two forms of angiotensin, and S. H. Ferreira highlighted the angiotensin-converting enzyme. So was open RAS, which are known at the present time, not only modulates arterial hypertension, but also affects the target organs, including the kidneys. The next step in the development of the doctrine of the RAS was the creation of the means of its pharmacological blockade. There were modern drugs that inhibit various parts of the RAS. The first representative was saralasin - receptor blocker to angiotensin II intravenous not found wide clinical application. A few years later developed the first drug class of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (captopril), after a decade and a half - non-peptide blocker of the receptors to angiotensin II (losartan), and later - indirect renin inhibitor (aliskiren). CONCLUSIONS: RAS plays an important role in the progression of chronic kidney disease, including renal transplant recipients, and its pharmacological blockade exerts renal protection effect and prevents lethal complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".