MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2620860449 · doi:10.1097/01.acm.0000520609.85345.87

Commentary on “Greener, Brighter”

2017· letter· en· W2620860449 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rachel R. Bian, Andrew H. Zureick, Robert S. Porter, Jennifer Stojan

Notice bibliographique

RevueAcademic Medicine · 2017
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiquePrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFeelingConversationStigma (botany)Meaning (existential)PsychologyDiseasePerspective (graphical)MedicineSocial psychologyPsychiatryPsychotherapist

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Unless we ourselves have experienced chronic illness, we cannot possibly understand the depth of its effect on patients. “Greener, Brighter”—a poem about the challenges chronic illness presents and the difficult adjustments often required of patients who live with such illness—arose out of our experiences in the University of Michigan Medical School’s Family Centered Experience (FCE) program. The FCE program allows medical students to consider the patient perspective of illness through a longitudinal lens. Students such as ourselves partner with an individual (and sometimes family members) living with a chronic disease, and together we explore themes such as breaking bad news, communication in the medical setting, and the stigma associated with a diagnosis. The patients and their families serve as mentors as we students seek to understand how illness affects all aspects of their daily lives. At the start of home visits with the volunteer families, we, in our naiveté, expected stigma and hardship to dominate the conversation. As we took the time to know the volunteers, we realized there was more to each story than just survival. The volunteers’ stories demonstrated that the struggles were not what defined them as individuals. Instead, they allowed the challenges of chronic illness to strengthen their identities, enabling them to adopt new roles that brought a deeper meaning to their experiences. “Greener, Brighter” acknowledges the initial challenges that follow a life-changing diagnosis, but ultimately illustrates the patient’s acceptance of these challenges and perseverance through chronic disease. The opening lines convey the feeling of despair that can accompany the early stages of chronic disease, especially the realization that a cure is not always available, even if treatments are. Individuals who live with chronic illness must endure not just their illness but also the burden of going home and adjusting to a new way of living. Things that worked smoothly before are now “too straight” or “too high.” What was familiar is now a daily reminder of disability, and activities that were previously taken for granted are now difficult. One of the patient volunteers we met experienced a devastating car crash that left him paralyzed below his arms. He has since required the assistance of nearly a dozen people in performing the basic activities of daily life. Patients’ difficulties adjusting to living with a chronic disease come from many fronts, whether explaining limitations to “curious eyes” or facing the judging “gavel” that is the stigma of disease. Ultimately, the volunteers we worked with all reached a moment when they realized that these setbacks, constraints, and judgments did not define their lives. The patient with paralysis has since adapted to his new life and now can operate a car independently with hand-controlled devices. Another patient volunteer now works to empower patients in their relationships with their physicians. In this poem, the patient asks the reader to “see me for who I am, not what I seem,” and to “hear the strength in my voice.” Readers must “open [their] eyes,” looking past “the patch of land broken by the plow of fire” to understand that disability does not necessarily indicate weakness or limitation. Just as one appreciates a forest emerging “greener, brighter” after a fire, the reader recognizes the patient’s triumphs over the challenges of illness. These triumphs are part of a larger story, and we by no means wish to downplay the continued hardships that individuals with chronic illness face, nor are we implying that everyone has a happy ending. Patients still need to adjust to a changed life. They have to adapt to the chair that “stands too straight” and to the counter that “sits too high.” The “crooked chair” and the “shorter table” become a part of the patient’s home—not the definition of their identity. Patients’ abilities to accept hardships, adapt to changes, and ultimately reaffirm their own convictions inspired us to write this poem as a tribute. The patient volunteers who worked with us inspired an original piano composition, which we present in synchrony as a lyric video to demonstrate the narrative of the patient experience. The piece begins quietly, reflecting the sense of loss that comes with a diagnosis. We draw in the viewer’s curiosity with the ominous “stiff white coats” and tentative progression of the music accompanying the poem’s first two stanzas. As the poem transitions to patients’ appreciation of their new identities, the music builds to echo their strength and resilience. In particular, the lines “My roots are still here / My heart is still here” are placed in conjunction with a powerful key change in the music. After a second, more meditative section, the common motif plays with confidence, reflecting the movement past hardships to resilience as the patient “[steps] away from the caverns, into the sunshine.” Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank the patient volunteers for their generosity in sharing their stories of battling a chronic illness. The Family Centered Experience (FCE) program was an extremely valuable aspect of the authors’ experience as first- and second-year medical students, and working with the patient volunteers has served as humbling preparation for a career dedicated to patients. The authors also acknowledge Dr. Arno Kumagai, FCE course director in 2015 when this commentary was written and now vice chair for education in the Department of Medicine at the University of Toronto, for reviewing their work and for his support and encouragement. Rachel R. Bian,* Andrew H. Zureick,* Robert S. Porter,* and Jennifer N. Stojan, MDR.R. Bian is a fourth-year medical student, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; [email protected]A.H. Zureick is a fourth-year medical student, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.R.S. Porter is a fourth-year student, Medical Scientist Training Program, Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.J.N. Stojan is an assistant professor, Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,058
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,059
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,089

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,058
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,003
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,010
Communication savante0,0060,008
Science ouverte0,0080,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0590,084
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,009

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,130
Tête enseignante GPT0,488
Écart entre enseignants0,358 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAcademic Medicine→Même sujetPrimary Care and Health Outcomes→Travaux en français237 207→