MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Commentary on “Greener, Brighter”

2017· letter· en· W2620860449 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rachel R. Bian, Andrew H. Zureick, Robert S. Porter, Jennifer Stojan

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademic Medicine · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingConversationStigma (botany)Meaning (existential)PsychologyDiseasePerspective (graphical)MedicineSocial psychologyPsychiatryPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unless we ourselves have experienced chronic illness, we cannot possibly understand the depth of its effect on patients. “Greener, Brighter”—a poem about the challenges chronic illness presents and the difficult adjustments often required of patients who live with such illness—arose out of our experiences in the University of Michigan Medical School’s Family Centered Experience (FCE) program. The FCE program allows medical students to consider the patient perspective of illness through a longitudinal lens. Students such as ourselves partner with an individual (and sometimes family members) living with a chronic disease, and together we explore themes such as breaking bad news, communication in the medical setting, and the stigma associated with a diagnosis. The patients and their families serve as mentors as we students seek to understand how illness affects all aspects of their daily lives. At the start of home visits with the volunteer families, we, in our naiveté, expected stigma and hardship to dominate the conversation. As we took the time to know the volunteers, we realized there was more to each story than just survival. The volunteers’ stories demonstrated that the struggles were not what defined them as individuals. Instead, they allowed the challenges of chronic illness to strengthen their identities, enabling them to adopt new roles that brought a deeper meaning to their experiences. “Greener, Brighter” acknowledges the initial challenges that follow a life-changing diagnosis, but ultimately illustrates the patient’s acceptance of these challenges and perseverance through chronic disease. The opening lines convey the feeling of despair that can accompany the early stages of chronic disease, especially the realization that a cure is not always available, even if treatments are. Individuals who live with chronic illness must endure not just their illness but also the burden of going home and adjusting to a new way of living. Things that worked smoothly before are now “too straight” or “too high.” What was familiar is now a daily reminder of disability, and activities that were previously taken for granted are now difficult. One of the patient volunteers we met experienced a devastating car crash that left him paralyzed below his arms. He has since required the assistance of nearly a dozen people in performing the basic activities of daily life. Patients’ difficulties adjusting to living with a chronic disease come from many fronts, whether explaining limitations to “curious eyes” or facing the judging “gavel” that is the stigma of disease. Ultimately, the volunteers we worked with all reached a moment when they realized that these setbacks, constraints, and judgments did not define their lives. The patient with paralysis has since adapted to his new life and now can operate a car independently with hand-controlled devices. Another patient volunteer now works to empower patients in their relationships with their physicians. In this poem, the patient asks the reader to “see me for who I am, not what I seem,” and to “hear the strength in my voice.” Readers must “open [their] eyes,” looking past “the patch of land broken by the plow of fire” to understand that disability does not necessarily indicate weakness or limitation. Just as one appreciates a forest emerging “greener, brighter” after a fire, the reader recognizes the patient’s triumphs over the challenges of illness. These triumphs are part of a larger story, and we by no means wish to downplay the continued hardships that individuals with chronic illness face, nor are we implying that everyone has a happy ending. Patients still need to adjust to a changed life. They have to adapt to the chair that “stands too straight” and to the counter that “sits too high.” The “crooked chair” and the “shorter table” become a part of the patient’s home—not the definition of their identity. Patients’ abilities to accept hardships, adapt to changes, and ultimately reaffirm their own convictions inspired us to write this poem as a tribute. The patient volunteers who worked with us inspired an original piano composition, which we present in synchrony as a lyric video to demonstrate the narrative of the patient experience. The piece begins quietly, reflecting the sense of loss that comes with a diagnosis. We draw in the viewer’s curiosity with the ominous “stiff white coats” and tentative progression of the music accompanying the poem’s first two stanzas. As the poem transitions to patients’ appreciation of their new identities, the music builds to echo their strength and resilience. In particular, the lines “My roots are still here / My heart is still here” are placed in conjunction with a powerful key change in the music. After a second, more meditative section, the common motif plays with confidence, reflecting the movement past hardships to resilience as the patient “[steps] away from the caverns, into the sunshine.” Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank the patient volunteers for their generosity in sharing their stories of battling a chronic illness. The Family Centered Experience (FCE) program was an extremely valuable aspect of the authors’ experience as first- and second-year medical students, and working with the patient volunteers has served as humbling preparation for a career dedicated to patients. The authors also acknowledge Dr. Arno Kumagai, FCE course director in 2015 when this commentary was written and now vice chair for education in the Department of Medicine at the University of Toronto, for reviewing their work and for his support and encouragement. Rachel R. Bian,* Andrew H. Zureick,* Robert S. Porter,* and Jennifer N. Stojan, MDR.R. Bian is a fourth-year medical student, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; [email protected]A.H. Zureick is a fourth-year medical student, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.R.S. Porter is a fourth-year student, Medical Scientist Training Program, Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.J.N. Stojan is an assistant professor, Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.058
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.058
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0080.005
Research integrity0.0590.084
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademic Medicine→Same topicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes→French-language works237,207→