Notice bibliographique
Résumé
REFLECTIONS : glass : water : art : science showcases contemporary artwork by a variety of artists inspired by the creative interaction of reflective material within the designed landscape of the Haining House and loch. The residency programme, coordinated by Inge Panneels, local artist and senior lecturer from the Department of Glass & Ceramics, University of Sunderland, was led by 3 artist agent provocateurs, and brought together creative practitioners from a variety of backgrounds including sculpture, photography, sound and dance.as well as glass and architecture students from Sunderland and Edinburgh University respectively. Inge Panneels explained “….” The Residency was a short creative lab where creative people, who each work with different materials, at different stages of their career and with different working practices, were sharing three days of experimentation reflecting on both the surroundings of the Haining and the Loch. This resulted in collaborative working, sharing skills, ideas and working methods. It was wonderful to see this burst of creativity in such a short space of time and with limited materials. The material of glass was a focus but found and recycled materials also played a big role in the creation of these experimental works, most of which were sited in or around the Loch. The exhibition will bring together a selection of the works produced as part of the residency as well as some developed pieces such as the collaborative sound and visual experience by Mark Timmins and James Wyness; the choreographed kinetic film by Helen Douglas, Jenna Agate and Claire Pencak; and the reflective installation by Felicity Bristow and Graham Patterson. A series of related events will also take place throughout the exhibition period including on glass blowing by Lindean Mill lampworking Zoe Garner and engraving by Heather Gillespie supported by Craft Scotland ; presentations on contemporary glass art by eminent Borders artist Douglas Hogg and the history of Scottish window glass; talks by leading academics Inge Panneels, Dr Cate Watkinson, and Dorian Wiszniewski on their research into glass : water : art : science; as well as the entertaining children’s performance ‘the Medieval Construction Science show’. All of the events are FREE to attend
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».