Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I first met Elaine Sommers Rich through her novel for young readers, Hannah Elizabeth, published by Harper and Row in 1964. My parents knew about Hannah Elizabeth because they had been at a Christian Writers' Conference with Rich at Green Lake, Wisconsin, in 1958. (4) They bought the book for me as a gift, impressing upon me that this Mennonite story, like the ethnic stories of Lois Lenski and Marguerite de Angeli, had been published by a major worldly press. To me this implied that the stories of Mennonites were worthy to stand beside those of other American minority and immigrant groups. Since we did not live in a Mennonite community, I often felt that the stories of my family and ancestors were too strange to be told to my peers at school. I was glad that Hannah Elizabeth would introduce these kinds of stories to a wider reading audience. Hannah Elizabeth is in many ways a novel about reading. It opens with the phrase What did the words mean? as Hannah, age 10, ponders her grandfather's reading of a Psalm in church. A lover of stories and books born into a close-knit, rural Mennonite family, Hannah holds a secret ambition to grow up to be a poet. In the book her love of imaginative literature is challenged by conservative church members but championed by her gentle grandfather in a church meeting when he reads a passage from Judges 9 in response to the question, should you ever tell children stories that are not true? In this poetic passage the speaking trees have the last word. Much later, as an English professor at Goshen College, I turned again to this passage in Hannah Elizabeth in my Critical Theory class as I introduced literary interpretation to students, many of them Mennonite, who questioned whether their love of imaginative literature had a practical application. Hannah Elizabeth was published in the United States during the same era that Rudy Wiebe published his landmark first novel, Peace Shall Destroy Many, in Canada, also with a major publishing house. Whereas Wiebe went on to publish many more novels with nationally recognized presses, Elaine Sommers Rich published her later works with Mennonite publishers and chose to write for a primarily Mennonite audience. Hannah Elizabeth was her only children's novel; her later fiction was written for adults. Her novels were based on her life experiences and those of close friends and family members, drawing on her ecumenical Christian vision rooted in Mennonite faith and practice. Elaine was also active in the work of the church in editing devotional books and a collection of essays on Mennonite women as well as writing adult Sunday school curriculum, a biography of Pauline Krehbiel Raid, and her long-running column for The Mennonite Weekly Review (now The Mennonite World Review), Thinking With. Born in 1926 in central Indiana in rural Kokomo, Elaine Sommers attended the Howard Miami congregation, a church built on a county line in an area between Marion, Peru, and Kokomo, where many Brethren, Durtkard, Quaker, and Pennsylvania Dutch had settled. This is the church portrayed in Hannah Elizabeth. The members of Elaine's church attended different schools, and many of the members had come from Amish or Quaker background. It appears that this rural cosmopolitanism created a setting in which meanings and values between groups were actively negotiated, creating an ideal matrix for a plot based on contested interpretations of language. Elaine attended high school during the war, and went straight from her junior year in high school to Goshen College, where she majored in English. After graduating from Goshen College in 1947, she stayed on for six more years to teach, taking one year away at Michigan State where she earned an M.A. in 1950. During the summer of 1947 Elaine joined a group of twenty-eight students from Goshen in a government-sponsored tour of Europe, where she met her future husband, Ronald Rich, a chemist, who was also on the tour. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».