MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621323305

Elaine Sommers Rich: A Tribute

2013· review· en· W2621323305 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ann Hostetler

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œMennonite quarterly review · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTributeReading (process)HistoryLiteratureReligious studiesArtClassicsArt historyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I first met Elaine Sommers Rich through her novel for young readers, Hannah Elizabeth, published by Harper and Row in 1964. My parents knew about Hannah Elizabeth because they had been at a Christian Writers' Conference with Rich at Green Lake, Wisconsin, in 1958. (4) They bought the book for me as a gift, impressing upon me that this Mennonite story, like the ethnic stories of Lois Lenski and Marguerite de Angeli, had been published by a major worldly press. To me this implied that the stories of Mennonites were worthy to stand beside those of other American minority and immigrant groups. Since we did not live in a Mennonite community, I often felt that the stories of my family and ancestors were too strange to be told to my peers at school. I was glad that Hannah Elizabeth would introduce these kinds of stories to a wider reading audience. Hannah Elizabeth is in many ways a novel about reading. It opens with the phrase What did the words mean? as Hannah, age 10, ponders her grandfather's reading of a Psalm in church. A lover of stories and books born into a close-knit, rural Mennonite family, Hannah holds a secret ambition to grow up to be a poet. In the book her love of imaginative literature is challenged by conservative church members but championed by her gentle grandfather in a church meeting when he reads a passage from Judges 9 in response to the question, should you ever tell children stories that are not true? In this poetic passage the speaking trees have the last word. Much later, as an English professor at Goshen College, I turned again to this passage in Hannah Elizabeth in my Critical Theory class as I introduced literary interpretation to students, many of them Mennonite, who questioned whether their love of imaginative literature had a practical application. Hannah Elizabeth was published in the United States during the same era that Rudy Wiebe published his landmark first novel, Peace Shall Destroy Many, in Canada, also with a major publishing house. Whereas Wiebe went on to publish many more novels with nationally recognized presses, Elaine Sommers Rich published her later works with Mennonite publishers and chose to write for a primarily Mennonite audience. Hannah Elizabeth was her only children's novel; her later fiction was written for adults. Her novels were based on her life experiences and those of close friends and family members, drawing on her ecumenical Christian vision rooted in Mennonite faith and practice. Elaine was also active in the work of the church in editing devotional books and a collection of essays on Mennonite women as well as writing adult Sunday school curriculum, a biography of Pauline Krehbiel Raid, and her long-running column for The Mennonite Weekly Review (now The Mennonite World Review), Thinking With. Born in 1926 in central Indiana in rural Kokomo, Elaine Sommers attended the Howard Miami congregation, a church built on a county line in an area between Marion, Peru, and Kokomo, where many Brethren, Durtkard, Quaker, and Pennsylvania Dutch had settled. This is the church portrayed in Hannah Elizabeth. The members of Elaine's church attended different schools, and many of the members had come from Amish or Quaker background. It appears that this rural cosmopolitanism created a setting in which meanings and values between groups were actively negotiated, creating an ideal matrix for a plot based on contested interpretations of language. Elaine attended high school during the war, and went straight from her junior year in high school to Goshen College, where she majored in English. After graduating from Goshen College in 1947, she stayed on for six more years to teach, taking one year away at Michigan State where she earned an M.A. in 1950. During the summer of 1947 Elaine joined a group of twenty-eight students from Goshen in a government-sponsored tour of Europe, where she met her future husband, Ronald Rich, a chemist, who was also on the tour. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œMennonite quarterly reviewSame topicAmerican Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207