The Short Depression-Happiness Scale:A Russian Translation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Over the last 25 years, there has been growing research interest in the field of positive psychology (Gable & Haidt, 2005; Ivtzan, Lomas, Hefieron, & Worth, 2015; Joseph, 2015; Lomas, Hefieron, & Ivtzan, 2014; Snyder & Lopez, 2009). Within contemporary positive psychology, there is a wide range of self-report instruments to measure strengths and virtues suitable for use by both researchers and clinicians (Lopez & Snyder, 2003). One area of specific interest has been the operationalization and conceptualization of the construct of happiness. Examples of self-report scales of happiness include the Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness (Kozma & Stones, 1980); the Affectometer 2 (Kammann & Flett, 1983); the Happiness Measures (Fordyce, 1988); the Oxford Happiness Inventory (Argyle, Martin, & Crossland, 1989); the Subjective Happiness Scale (also known as the General Happiness Scale); (Lyubomirsky & Lepper, 1999); the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (Hills & Argyle, 2002); the Subjective Fluctuating Happiness Scale (Dambrun et ah, 2012); the Subjective Authentic Durable Happiness Scale (Dambrun et ah, 2012); and the Pemberton Happiness Index (Hervas & Vazquez, 2013).One established measure of happiness is the 25-item Depression-Happiness Scale (Joseph & Lewis, 1998). The Depression-Happiness Scale consists of 13 items with negative (e.g., I felt sad) and 12 items with positive content (e.g., I felt cheerful). The positive and negative items were constructed in a way, that they should represent each other's opposites and include the same level of intensity (I felt happy vs. I felt sad). Each item is rated on a four-point scale: never (0), rarely (1 ), sometimes (2), and (3). Three scores can be calculated: One for positive feelings, one for negative feelings, and a total-score (Lewis, Joseph, & McCollam, 1996). The 13 items concerned with negative thoughts, feelings, and bodily experiences are reverse scored so that possible scores of the total scale can range from 0 to 75 and the higher the score, the happier a person is rated. Previous studies have shown good internal consistencies for the total score ranging from .85 to .95 (Lewis et ah, 1996; Lewis, McCollam, & Joseph, 2001; McGrealJ Farsi (Bayani, 2006); and German (Paulitsch, Lewis, & Hartig, 2017). There also exists a 6-item Short Depression-Happiness Scale (Joseph, Linley, Harwood, Lewis, & McCollam, 2004) for use when time or space is limited. The Short Depression-Happiness Scale has been translated into Turkish (Sapmaz & Temizel, 2013); and can also be derived from the parent Depression-Happiness Scale translations into Hindi (Kishore & Pal, 2003); Farsi (Bayani, 2006); and German (Paulitsch et al., 2017). The Short Depression-Happiness Scale has the same structure and content as the original 2 5-item but has only six items. Therefore, the total scale can range from 0 to 3 0.At present within the Russian-speaking world, there is much interest among social scientists in positive psychology (Lyubomirsky, 2014). Indeed, Russia provides an interesting context to undertake such work. For example, there are inconsistencies in findings and commentaries that Russia consistently ranks low in levels of happiness in international comparisons (Myers & Diener, 1995; Smetanina, 2011 ; Yelshansky, Anufriev, Saparin, & Semyonov, 2016).Practically for researchers and clinicians interested in positive psychology in the Russian context, there are presently a growing number of scales available in the Russian language (Yelshansky, Anufriev, Kamaletdinova, Saparin, & Semyonov, 2016a; Yelshansky, Anufriev, Kamaletdinova et al., 2016b) and these are often Russian language translations of established scales developed in other languages. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».