Charles Ritchie and the English diary tradition / by Pat Barclay. --
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The literary merit of the diaries of Charles Ritchie is \napparent to anyone who reads them. A more critical assessment is \nhindered, however, by the fact that there is as yet in Canada no \nliterary context in which the writings of any indigenous diarists may \nbe placed. In order to assess the literary merit of the diaries of \nCharles Ritchie, therefore, this thesis examines them in relation to \nthe "conceptual perspectives" for English diary-writing as established \nin Private Chronicles; A Study of English Diaries, by Robert A. \nFothergill of York University in Toronto. The introduction presents \nthe case for such an examination and outlines the history of the \nEnglish diary tradition and the scope of Fothergill's study. Chapter \nOne defines the criteria which Fothergill believes have been developed \nfor the diary genre by the "great" diarists themselves, and which are \nbased on the two complementary concepts of "book of the self" and \n"imprint." These two concepts are then applied to the writings of \nCharles Ritchie, and his use of "new forms" containing "new expressive \npossibilities" is described. Various motives for diary-writing are \ndiscussed in Chapter Two, in relation to the discernable motives of \nCharles Ritchie. Chapters Three and Four divide the four volumes of \nRitchie's diary into two distinct parts, with Chapter Three discussing \nthe two earlier diaries as the work of a "Becoming" diarist, and \nChapter Four treating the two later volumes as the work of a diarist who has "Become". Ritchie's "autobiographical consciousness" is the \nsubject of Chapter Five, which asserts his claim to the title of \n"serial autobiographer." Chapter Six looks at Ritchie?s contribution \nto the "history of 'sensibility'" and shows how his particular \nsensibility reflects not only the age in which he lives, but also his \nNova Scotian Canadian identity. This study concludes by determining \nthat Charles Ritchie is a "serial autobiographer" with creative \n"sensibilities," who has found a "new form containing new expressive \npossibilities." As such, he deserves an honoured place in the English \ndiary tradition and membership in that company of "great" diarists \nwhich includes such distinguished peers as Samuel Pepys and Anais Nin.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle