Bangkok International Summit (2007) Declaration on Policing Cyberspace
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
IntroductionThe Conference on Policing Cyberspace of POLCYB,4 first held in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada in 1999, has become a premier international forum for the presentation and discussion of advances in Policing cyberspace and the multifaceted issue of cyber crimes. In view of recent scientific advances and the ongoing consideration of policy options for addressing the cyber crime problem, the Seventh Annual Conference in Bangkok, Thailand on November 5 - 9, 2007, presented a timely opportunity to address key questions concerning policing cyberspace. The technical program for the conference contained a diverse and multidisciplinary assemblage of more than 100 abstracts submitted by authors from many countries, contributing to the global scientific effort on prevention of cyber crime.Forty experts, assembled into four groups, at the Law Enforcement Academy, Bangkok, Thailand, worked after the conference at the Post-Summit Digital Evidence focus group discussions. The focus groups addressed a series of key, policy-relevant questions concerning Policing Cyberspace such as Emerging Future Trends and Technologies/Malware, Financial and Organized Crime, and Protocols, Child Exploitation. The focus groups presented their findings on 9th November 2007. Summaries of these findings were available for viewing by all registered conference participants in the POLCYB website. Collectively, the four focus group summaries provided the foundation for the Conference Declaration, a summary document that was endorsed unanimously by members of the four expert groups.Theme and Sub-themes of the SummitThe Summit Theme was, International Policing and Policy Perspectives on Countering Cybercrime and the sub-themes were:* Challenges in Collection and Application of Digital Evidence.* Digital Identity - New technologies; best practices and challenges in development of standards and frameworks; policy gap analysis.* Current Cyber crime Trends / Threats - Investigation & Prosecution perspectives.* Data Protection, Privacy, and Identity Management.* Building Trusted Communities in the Virtual World.* E-Money Laundering in Financial Sectors: Legal Obligations of Banking.* Disrupting Organized Crime.* Child Exploitation.* Pharmaceutical Crime on Internet.* Economic Crime / Organized Crime:* Counterfeit Products / Intellectual Property* Spam, Phishing, Botnets* Identity Theft* & Harvest* Pharmaceutical Crime on Internet* Online Games* Online Trading/Banking* Risk assessment of Converging Technologies and Emerging Technologies* Challenges and Best Practices in Development of Trusted Communities* Privacy* Child Exploitation* Response from Multinational Companies to Hack and Harvest incidents and other cyber threats* Training and Accreditation (Forensic Investigator; Forensic Analyst; Forensic Accountant, etc.)* Cyber Intelligence (Honey Pot, Email Spamming, etc.)* Counter cyber intelligence (technologies that thwart computer forensic investigations)* Best Practices in investigation and prosecution using Digital Evidence (Incident Reports, Lab Management; Digital Evidence Recovery; Network Forensics, etc.)* Protection of Industrial Infrastructure* Homeland Security / Critical Infrastructure Protection / Cyber-terrorism* Drafting Principles / Impact / Enforcement of Legislations and Polices relating to Cyber crime / Information Security / Communications / Privacy* Integrated Approach to Management of Hi-tech Offenders* Considerations for developing communication protocols to build Trusted Communities.BANKOK INTERNATIONAL SUMMIT (2007) DECLARATION ON POLICING CYBERSPACE: BASED ON THE FACILITATED FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONObjectives of the Focus group discussion:* To share information on challenges in the collection and application of digital evidence in terms of social, legal, economic considerations. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».