Bangkok International Summit (2007) Declaration on Policing Cyberspace
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IntroductionThe Conference on Policing Cyberspace of POLCYB,4 first held in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada in 1999, has become a premier international forum for the presentation and discussion of advances in Policing cyberspace and the multifaceted issue of cyber crimes. In view of recent scientific advances and the ongoing consideration of policy options for addressing the cyber crime problem, the Seventh Annual Conference in Bangkok, Thailand on November 5 - 9, 2007, presented a timely opportunity to address key questions concerning policing cyberspace. The technical program for the conference contained a diverse and multidisciplinary assemblage of more than 100 abstracts submitted by authors from many countries, contributing to the global scientific effort on prevention of cyber crime.Forty experts, assembled into four groups, at the Law Enforcement Academy, Bangkok, Thailand, worked after the conference at the Post-Summit Digital Evidence focus group discussions. The focus groups addressed a series of key, policy-relevant questions concerning Policing Cyberspace such as Emerging Future Trends and Technologies/Malware, Financial and Organized Crime, and Protocols, Child Exploitation. The focus groups presented their findings on 9th November 2007. Summaries of these findings were available for viewing by all registered conference participants in the POLCYB website. Collectively, the four focus group summaries provided the foundation for the Conference Declaration, a summary document that was endorsed unanimously by members of the four expert groups.Theme and Sub-themes of the SummitThe Summit Theme was, International Policing and Policy Perspectives on Countering Cybercrime and the sub-themes were:* Challenges in Collection and Application of Digital Evidence.* Digital Identity - New technologies; best practices and challenges in development of standards and frameworks; policy gap analysis.* Current Cyber crime Trends / Threats - Investigation & Prosecution perspectives.* Data Protection, Privacy, and Identity Management.* Building Trusted Communities in the Virtual World.* E-Money Laundering in Financial Sectors: Legal Obligations of Banking.* Disrupting Organized Crime.* Child Exploitation.* Pharmaceutical Crime on Internet.* Economic Crime / Organized Crime:* Counterfeit Products / Intellectual Property* Spam, Phishing, Botnets* Identity Theft* & Harvest* Pharmaceutical Crime on Internet* Online Games* Online Trading/Banking* Risk assessment of Converging Technologies and Emerging Technologies* Challenges and Best Practices in Development of Trusted Communities* Privacy* Child Exploitation* Response from Multinational Companies to Hack and Harvest incidents and other cyber threats* Training and Accreditation (Forensic Investigator; Forensic Analyst; Forensic Accountant, etc.)* Cyber Intelligence (Honey Pot, Email Spamming, etc.)* Counter cyber intelligence (technologies that thwart computer forensic investigations)* Best Practices in investigation and prosecution using Digital Evidence (Incident Reports, Lab Management; Digital Evidence Recovery; Network Forensics, etc.)* Protection of Industrial Infrastructure* Homeland Security / Critical Infrastructure Protection / Cyber-terrorism* Drafting Principles / Impact / Enforcement of Legislations and Polices relating to Cyber crime / Information Security / Communications / Privacy* Integrated Approach to Management of Hi-tech Offenders* Considerations for developing communication protocols to build Trusted Communities.BANKOK INTERNATIONAL SUMMIT (2007) DECLARATION ON POLICING CYBERSPACE: BASED ON THE FACILITATED FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONObjectives of the Focus group discussion:* To share information on challenges in the collection and application of digital evidence in terms of social, legal, economic considerations. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".