MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2624740026

Experimental, Numerical, and Soft Computing-Based Analysis of the Vapex Process in Heavy Oil Systems

2014· dissertation· en· W2624740026 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Mehdi Mohammadpoor

Notice bibliographique

RevueoURspace (University of Regina) · 2014
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesFaculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of AlbertaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Regina
Mots-clésDegree (music)Process (computing)Soft systems methodologySoft computingPetroleumEngineeringPetroleum engineeringEngineering managementComputer scienceMechanical engineeringChemistryInformation systemPhysicsManagement information systemsArtificial intelligenceOperating systemElectrical engineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

There are significant heavy oil and bitumen resources in Canada. Considering increasing energy demands, these abundant resources are a potential energy source. Regardless, looking for an economically viable and environmentally friendly heavy oil recovery technique is essential for exploiting not just these resources, but all future heavy oil resources. The problems with highly viscous heavy oil reservoirs—excessive heat loss to the surrounding formations, low permeability carbonate reservoirs, and the large amount of CO2 emitted during these thermal processes—introduce economic and environmental drawbacks for thermal methods. In fact, solvent-based heavy oil recovery methods have recently gained attention due to the potential environmental and economic advantages over the thermal processes. In this research, an extensive experimental investigation was carried out to evaluate the effect of solvent type and drainage height, as the key parameters of VAPEX in heavy oil recovery. To accomplish this goal, two large, visual rectangular, sand-packed VAPEX models with 24.5 cm and 47.5 cm heights were employed to run the experiments using Plover Lake heavy oil (5650mPa.s) with a low permeability (6~9 D) sand pack. Propane, methane, CO2, butane, propane/CO2 mixture, and propane/methane mixture were considered as respective solvents for the experiments. Various parameters were monitored and recorded during the course of experiments. Moreover, separate experiments were carried out at the end of each VAPEX experiment to measure the asphaltene precipitation at different locations of the VAPEX models. To observe the drainage height effect in more detail, a comprehensive image analysis was completed during the solvent chamber evolution. As a result, it was determined that drainage height has a significant impact on production rate and heavy oil recovery. The results prove the complexity of the effect of drainage height and the up-scaling issues with the VAPEX process. Furthermore, in terms of solvents, propane showed the best recovery performance due to its favourable low vapour pressure and high solubility. Ultimately, promising recovery performance after introducing CO2 and methane as the carrier gases was observed. Separate experiments were conducted to obtain adequate PVT data for the heavy oil and solvents used in this study. A numerical simulation study was carried out to match experimental results and investigate the effect of well spacing, permeability, and diffusivity on the VAPEX process. Finally, the data gathered from the experiments were combined with available data in the literature and a soft computing approach was utilized to develop a model that predicts the recovery performance of the VAPEX process. Several experimental studies together with various analytical models have been proposed to simulate and describe the performance of the VAPEX process. However, due to the complexity of the mechanisms associated with the solvent injection process (i.e., diffusion and gravity drainage processes), such models are incapable of accurately predicting the production rate during the VAPEX process. In this research, artificial neural networks (ANN) technique was utilized to tackle the limitations that analytical methods encounter where there is uncertainty, and imprecision.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,049
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,848

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,217
Écart entre enseignants0,211 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueoURspace (University of Regina)Même sujetEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesTravaux en français237 207