MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2624740026

Experimental, Numerical, and Soft Computing-Based Analysis of the Vapex Process in Heavy Oil Systems

2014· dissertation· en· W2624740026 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mehdi Mohammadpoor

Bibliographic record

VenueoURspace (University of Regina) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFaculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of AlbertaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Regina
KeywordsDegree (music)Process (computing)Soft systems methodologySoft computingPetroleumEngineeringPetroleum engineeringEngineering managementComputer scienceMechanical engineeringChemistryInformation systemPhysicsManagement information systemsArtificial intelligenceOperating systemElectrical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are significant heavy oil and bitumen resources in Canada. Considering increasing energy demands, these abundant resources are a potential energy source. Regardless, looking for an economically viable and environmentally friendly heavy oil recovery technique is essential for exploiting not just these resources, but all future heavy oil resources. The problems with highly viscous heavy oil reservoirs—excessive heat loss to the surrounding formations, low permeability carbonate reservoirs, and the large amount of CO2 emitted during these thermal processes—introduce economic and environmental drawbacks for thermal methods. In fact, solvent-based heavy oil recovery methods have recently gained attention due to the potential environmental and economic advantages over the thermal processes. In this research, an extensive experimental investigation was carried out to evaluate the effect of solvent type and drainage height, as the key parameters of VAPEX in heavy oil recovery. To accomplish this goal, two large, visual rectangular, sand-packed VAPEX models with 24.5 cm and 47.5 cm heights were employed to run the experiments using Plover Lake heavy oil (5650mPa.s) with a low permeability (6~9 D) sand pack. Propane, methane, CO2, butane, propane/CO2 mixture, and propane/methane mixture were considered as respective solvents for the experiments. Various parameters were monitored and recorded during the course of experiments. Moreover, separate experiments were carried out at the end of each VAPEX experiment to measure the asphaltene precipitation at different locations of the VAPEX models. To observe the drainage height effect in more detail, a comprehensive image analysis was completed during the solvent chamber evolution. As a result, it was determined that drainage height has a significant impact on production rate and heavy oil recovery. The results prove the complexity of the effect of drainage height and the up-scaling issues with the VAPEX process. Furthermore, in terms of solvents, propane showed the best recovery performance due to its favourable low vapour pressure and high solubility. Ultimately, promising recovery performance after introducing CO2 and methane as the carrier gases was observed. Separate experiments were conducted to obtain adequate PVT data for the heavy oil and solvents used in this study. A numerical simulation study was carried out to match experimental results and investigate the effect of well spacing, permeability, and diffusivity on the VAPEX process. Finally, the data gathered from the experiments were combined with available data in the literature and a soft computing approach was utilized to develop a model that predicts the recovery performance of the VAPEX process. Several experimental studies together with various analytical models have been proposed to simulate and describe the performance of the VAPEX process. However, due to the complexity of the mechanisms associated with the solvent injection process (i.e., diffusion and gravity drainage processes), such models are incapable of accurately predicting the production rate during the VAPEX process. In this research, artificial neural networks (ANN) technique was utilized to tackle the limitations that analytical methods encounter where there is uncertainty, and imprecision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueoURspace (University of Regina)Same topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207