MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2624748903 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.1974.1974

Combined DNA and Transcriptome Sequencing Reveals Discrete Subtypes of Myelodysplasia

2016· article· en· W2624748903 sur OpenAlexaff
Yusuke Shiozawa, Luca Malcovati, Anna Gallì, Andrea Pellagatti, Hiromichi Suzuki, Tetsuichi Yoshizato, Yusuke Sato, Keisuke Kataoka, Kenichi Yoshida, Masashi Sanada, Hideki Makishima, Yuichi Shiraishi, Kenichi Chiba, Satoru Miyano, Jacqueline Boultwood, Eva Hellström-Lindberg, Seishi Ogawa, Mario Cazzola

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyCD34TranscriptomeMyelodysplastic syndromesProportional hazards modelMyeloidSurvival analysisBone marrowGeneNPM1Cancer researchGeneticsImmunologyGene expressionMolecular biologyStem cellInternal medicineMedicineKaryotype

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Although gene expression profile of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) had been widely studied, gene expression-based disease classification was yet to be established. We performed combined DNA and transcriptome sequencing to assess the relationship between genomic lesions, transcriptomic data, hematologic phenotype, and clinical outcome were analyzed. Methods We enrolled a total of 214 patients with myeloid neoplasms with myelodysplasia, for whom complete clinical and pathological data were available. Oncogenic variants and copy number alterations were identified by targeted-capture sequencing using RNA baits designed for 89 known or putative driver genes in myeloid neoplasms and 1,674 single nucleotide polymorphisms. RNA sequencing was performed on both bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) and CD34+ cells (n = 51), only CD34+ cells (n = 49), or BMMNCs alone (n = 114). Consensus clustering was performed to identify robust and stable molecular subgroups. Survival analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate survival analyses were performed by means of Cox proportional hazards regression. Included variables were age, sex, %marrow blast, cytogenetic abnormalities, hemoglobin, absolute neutrophil count, and platelet levels. Results Unsupervised clustering of gene expression data of CD34+ cells from 100 cases identified two stable subgroups. The first subgroup was characterized by a lower blast count, and the up-regulation of genes specifically detected in erythroid lineages. By contrast, the second subgroup was significantly associated with an increased blast count, and expression of the genes related to stem/progenitor cells. These differences became more conspicuous when the comparison was made with healthy adults. Up-regulated expression of many signaling pathway genes, including MAPK, PI3K, and JAK/STAT signaling, was also a conspicuous feature of the second subgroup. To investigate the genetic basis of these unique expression profiles, we compared frequencies of genetic lesions between the two subgroups. The patients in the second subgroup had a higher number of mutations (median 2 [range 0-6] vs. 4 [0-10], P = 0.016) and copy number alterations (median 0 [0-6] vs. 0 [0-9], P = 0.0053) than those in the first subgroup. Among those lesions observed in >10% in either subgroup, SF3B1 and TET2 mutations were significantly enriched in the first subgroup (q-value < 0.1). Del(7)/del(7q), NRAS, and TP53 mutations were also more frequent in the second subgroup (q-value < 0.1). Clinical outcomes also differed substantially between both subgroups. Compared to the first subgroup, the second subgroup was significantly associated with a combined endpoint of death or leukemic transformation in either univariate (hazard ratio 20.3 [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.59-89.6], P < 0.001) or multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 15.5 [95% CI, 3.05-79.2], P < 0.001) at a median follow-up of 8.5 months (range, 0-103 months). Especially no leukemic transformation occurred in the first subgroup, which was in contrast to the very high leukemic transformation rate in the second subgroup (38%). These subgroups were based on the gene expression profile of bone marrow CD34+ cells purified from BMMNCs. To enhance clinical utility, we sought to construct a classifier of the molecular subgroups using gene expression of unfractionated BMMNCs. Among the 100 patients with CD34+ cells, 51 were also analyzed by RNA sequencing for BMMNCs, which were used as a training cohort. Ten-fold cross-validation on the training set identified a logistic regression model with 25 genes, which as applied to the remaining 114 cases with only BMMNC samples. Again, SF3B1 mutations were most significantly enriched in the predicted low-risk subgroup. Predicted high-risk subgroup was significantly associated with poor prognosis in either univariate or multivariate analysis. This gene expression-based classification enabled better stratification of patients at risk of leukemic transformation by combining information on bone marrow blast count. Conclusion We showed that myeloid neoplasms with myelodysplasia can be subgrouped into two major classes with erythroid and stem/progenitor cell signature. This newly developed molecular classification might improve risk prediction and treatment stratification of MDS. Disclosures Kataoka: Yakult: Honoraria; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria. Makishima:The Yasuda Medical Foundation: Research Funding. Ogawa:Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kan research institute: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,002

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,266
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→