Assessment of stope sequence alternatives in a diminishing ore pillar
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
One of the primary mine planning abilities of numerical models is their assessment of stope sequence alternatives in terms of the redistribution of mining-induced stresses and the amount of rock face displacements in each of them. The models used for these studies are large and complex in nature as they need to replicate the entire orebody within which the stope sequence is being planned, in addition to the surrounding rock mass. In this paper, a case study is conducted at Vale’s Garson Mine for the stope sequence options of mining in Orebody #1 Shear West, which will result in a central diminishing ore pillar before final extraction. A mine-wide numerical model is first constructed in FLAC3D and calibrated based on an in situ stress measurement point on 4900L (1,495 m) such that the values read in the field are correlated to those generated by the model. The historical stope sequence followed at the mine is then replicated between the years 2001 and 2011, which is when mining is planned to commence between the levels of interest in #1 Shear West. Extraction is planned from both the eastern and western sides of the orebody, and the default sequence is considered to alternate between the two in each successive step as they move towards the diminishing ore pillar. Using the brittle shear ratio – the relationship between the differential stress (sigma 1 to sigma 3) and unconfined compressive strength of intact rock – and volumetric analysis, the planned stope sequence is assessed within the diminishing ore pillar. A threshold of 0.7 is considered as indicative of ore at risk based on the literature and Vale guidelines. A second sequence alternative, in which extraction in the east is accelerated thrice, is also considered and compared with the planned one. A new stope sequence planning tool is introduced to visually and quantitatively compare amongst the two sequences. It is shown that by using the planning tool, the volume of unmined ore (of operational and economical interest) and the volume of ore at risk (of ground control interest) can be quantitatively estimated at any given mining step. Finally, variations in rock mass properties based on laboratory results and borehole logs are considered to assess their effect on the volume of ore at risk in the alternative sequence.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle