Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Tolerability of a Single-Dose Oral Solution of Dabigatran Given after Standard Anticoagulant Therapy in Children (Two Age Groups: 1-<2 and 2-<12 Years Old), with Venous Thromboembolism
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children is increasing. The current standard of care is unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), all of which have limitations. Dabigatran, which is orally administered as the prodrug, dabigatran etexilate (DE), is effective for the treatment of VTE in adults and may overcome some of the limitations associated with standard care. Objective: The objectives of this phase IIa study were to obtain pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data and to evaluate the tolerability and safety of an oral liquid formulation (OLF) of DE in patients aged 1 to < 12 years. Methods: The open-label, multinational, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study was conducted in patients aged 1 to < 2 years and 2 to < 12 years with a diagnosis of VTE, who had completed planned treatment with LMWH or oral anticoagulants (VKAs) for VTE. DE was administered as an OLF at a weight and age-adjusted dose (calculated using a nomogram) equivalent to 150 mg twice daily (bid) in adults. Originally, all patients were to receive multiple dosing (bid for 3 days). However, this was replaced with single dosing (SD) in the course of the study. A 30-day follow-up was included. Here we report data from SD patients only. The primary PK endpoints were plasma concentration of total dabigatran, free dabigatran, unchanged DE and intermediate metabolites. To compare the exposure to DE in pediatrics with that in adults with VTE, gMean concentrations at 10 hours after SD of DE were extrapolated to steady-state trough concentration. An accumulation ratio was calculated based on the terminal half-life (t1/2) and the dosing interval (for a bid dosing regimen) to project the steady-state dabigatran plasma concentration. Primary PD endpoints were activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), ecarin clotting time (ECT), and diluted thrombin time (dTT). Primary safety endpoints were incidence of all bleeding events and incidence of all adverse events (AEs). Results: Six patients aged 1 to < 2 years and 9 patients aged 2 to < 12 years received SD DE; 3 patients aged 2 to < 12 received multiple doses (bid for 3 days). In the SD groups, plasma concentration of total dabigatran increased at 2 hours (peak) after dosing then decreased until 10 hours after dosing. The projected steady-state dabigatran trough concentrations of both age groups of children studied were largely comparable to those observed in adults with VTE, i.e. the projected results for children fell between the first and the third quartile of adult trough concentrations (Table). Data from the SD groups indicated that there was a linear PK/PD relationship for ECT and dTT (see Figure) and a non-linear PK/PD relationship for aPTT. The PK/PD relationships were similar to those seen in adults (for all coagulation parameters analyzed) and adolescents (dTT and ECT) with VTE. During the on-treatment period there were no study drug related AEs; one patient had AEs (leukopenia and dizziness), which were mild in intensity and unrelated to the study drug. No AEs were reported during the post-treatment or post-study periods. No bleeding events were reported. Conclusion: The OLF of DE was well tolerated in pediatrics, with no drug-related AEs or bleeding events. Projected steady-state dabigatran trough concentrations were largely comparable to those seen in adults with VTE. The observed PK/PD relationship was similar to that seen in adults and adolescents with VTE. Disclosures Halton: Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Pediatric Expert Working Group for Boehringer Ingelheim. Albisetti:Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Pediatric Expert Working Group. Luciani:Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Member of Pediatric Expert Working Group for Boehringer Ingelheim. Huang:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Biss:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Brueckmann:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Gropper:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Maas:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Tartakovsky:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Mitchell:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».