Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the beginning, he wanted no pictures and only the most general of words. In the end, he let journalists catch him sweeping tears from his face. Over the months of that transformation, Hall of Fame baseball player Rod Carew helped his daughter create a legacy of evocative images, both photographic and word painted. Rod had long been protective of his family's privacy, creating a cocoon in reaction to the physical abuse meted out decades earlier by his father. Like many athletes in the public eye, he had always had an uneasy relationship with the media and sometimes-by his own admission-was less than pleasant to journalists. He figured that his life on the field was the press's to record; his life off the field was his to shield. The Angels hitting instructor and former Minnesota Twins and Angels player had always let his batting statistics speak for themselves: seven American League batting titles and more than 3,000 hits. So, late in 1995, a month after was diagnosed with cancer and taken to Children's Hospital of Orange County, California, Rod and his wife, Manlynn, gave directives to the pair of us in the hospital's public relations department. One was to get this message out to the public: call the National Marrow Donor Program at 1-800-MARROW and have your bone marrow tested to see if you are a match for or another cancer patient. Be sure to emphasize the low numbers of minorities in the registry, the transplant coordinators told us, because it is more difficult to find matches for Michelle-with a black father and a white mother-and others of mixed ancestry. The Carews, though, did not want family members photographed. If members of the press needed a picture, they could use a file shot of Rod. Even after Andrea Pronk, my assistant, and counseled him that art often determines the play of a story, Rod refused to budge. So, because columns usually stand without artwork, arranged Rod's first interview with Orange County Register columnist Bill Johnson, an African-American, who wrote: In a tiny conference room on the third floor of Children's Hospital of Orange County, the Hall of Famer is talking. Only his lips move. His wife, seated next to him, is still except for the tears falling from her cheeks. A visitor listens, barely breathing. A sensor, detecting the lack of movements, trips the light and plunges the room into darkness. A strange, chilling coincidence, perhaps. Rod Carew, his face tired and expressionless, had been recounting the moment he and his wife, Marilynn, were told by doctors that their youngest daughter, 17-year-old Michelle, had been diagnosed with acute non-lymphocytic leukemia. I just stood there, you know, he recalls, a sad far-away look in his eyes. All could think about was death. then the room went dark. remembered watching games from a seat high in the stands of the Anaheim stadium and pumping my fists and cheering when Rod stroked an outfield fly to score a winning run. But now, after this column circulated through television news departments, he was going to make a more substantial sacrifice: his privacy. From her hospital bed, told Rod, Daddy, want you to be my voice. So, when Los Angeles television sportscasters Jim Hill and Rick Lozano asked for interviews, Rod--aware that w is a medium that demands pictures--knew what he had to do if Michelle's message was to spread into millions of Southern California households. Rick's cameraperson showed the family--including sisters Stephanie and Charryse--nestled beside Michelle's bed in the hospital's oncology intensive care unit. Michelle, her hair braided and gathered at the top, grinned and wept and said she hoped she could find a bone marrow match. She talked about her favorite Disney videos, giving Rick a segue: Michelle and the entire Carew clan are hoping for a Cinderella ending to this story.... And here the camera froze on Michelle's sunburst of a dimpled smile as Rick concluded, After all, smiles like this are all too rare. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,113 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».