Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the beginning, he wanted no pictures and only the most general of words. In the end, he let journalists catch him sweeping tears from his face. Over the months of that transformation, Hall of Fame baseball player Rod Carew helped his daughter create a legacy of evocative images, both photographic and word painted. Rod had long been protective of his family's privacy, creating a cocoon in reaction to the physical abuse meted out decades earlier by his father. Like many athletes in the public eye, he had always had an uneasy relationship with the media and sometimes-by his own admission-was less than pleasant to journalists. He figured that his life on the field was the press's to record; his life off the field was his to shield. The Angels hitting instructor and former Minnesota Twins and Angels player had always let his batting statistics speak for themselves: seven American League batting titles and more than 3,000 hits. So, late in 1995, a month after was diagnosed with cancer and taken to Children's Hospital of Orange County, California, Rod and his wife, Manlynn, gave directives to the pair of us in the hospital's public relations department. One was to get this message out to the public: call the National Marrow Donor Program at 1-800-MARROW and have your bone marrow tested to see if you are a match for or another cancer patient. Be sure to emphasize the low numbers of minorities in the registry, the transplant coordinators told us, because it is more difficult to find matches for Michelle-with a black father and a white mother-and others of mixed ancestry. The Carews, though, did not want family members photographed. If members of the press needed a picture, they could use a file shot of Rod. Even after Andrea Pronk, my assistant, and counseled him that art often determines the play of a story, Rod refused to budge. So, because columns usually stand without artwork, arranged Rod's first interview with Orange County Register columnist Bill Johnson, an African-American, who wrote: In a tiny conference room on the third floor of Children's Hospital of Orange County, the Hall of Famer is talking. Only his lips move. His wife, seated next to him, is still except for the tears falling from her cheeks. A visitor listens, barely breathing. A sensor, detecting the lack of movements, trips the light and plunges the room into darkness. A strange, chilling coincidence, perhaps. Rod Carew, his face tired and expressionless, had been recounting the moment he and his wife, Marilynn, were told by doctors that their youngest daughter, 17-year-old Michelle, had been diagnosed with acute non-lymphocytic leukemia. I just stood there, you know, he recalls, a sad far-away look in his eyes. All could think about was death. then the room went dark. remembered watching games from a seat high in the stands of the Anaheim stadium and pumping my fists and cheering when Rod stroked an outfield fly to score a winning run. But now, after this column circulated through television news departments, he was going to make a more substantial sacrifice: his privacy. From her hospital bed, told Rod, Daddy, want you to be my voice. So, when Los Angeles television sportscasters Jim Hill and Rick Lozano asked for interviews, Rod--aware that w is a medium that demands pictures--knew what he had to do if Michelle's message was to spread into millions of Southern California households. Rick's cameraperson showed the family--including sisters Stephanie and Charryse--nestled beside Michelle's bed in the hospital's oncology intensive care unit. Michelle, her hair braided and gathered at the top, grinned and wept and said she hoped she could find a bone marrow match. She talked about her favorite Disney videos, giving Rick a segue: Michelle and the entire Carew clan are hoping for a Cinderella ending to this story.... And here the camera froze on Michelle's sunburst of a dimpled smile as Rick concluded, After all, smiles like this are all too rare. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.113 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".