Stories from the field: narratives by practitioners from across Canada demonstrating the integration of social justice into counselling practice
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Workshop A was well attended, primarily by practitioners interested in how to engage in social justice activities as part of their private or agency practice. The ideas presented were positively received. Discussion focused on the systemic barriers for counsellors in terms of restrictions on their time, roles, and agency mandates. The powerpoint presentation is attached. \n \nWorkshop B was also well attended. This was a different group of individuals who were also interested in how counsellors can have a positive impact on the systems that create problems for their clients in the first place. Part of the purpose of this session was to profile the social justice chapter of the Canadian Counselling Association, of which I am now the president. There was considerable interest generated and a number of means for continuing the work of the chapter through the year were suggested. We will be following up on a number of those over the summer, including setting up a discussion forum for Canadian counsellors interested in social justice activities. The powerpoint presentation is attached. \n \nWorkshop C was a panel discussion that was not well attended, primarily due to scheduling alongside on of the keynote speakers for the conference. However, we did proceed with our panel discussion and included the small audience in that dialogue. This was a good opportunity to touch base with counsellor educators across the country and see what others see as the current issues and trends. My focus was on distance education, primarily from a social justice perspective. This is a timely discussion because there is a lot of misinformation and bias in professional regulatory circles related to distance education professional programs and I am trying to be proactive in addressing some of these concerns. There was no formal presentation; however, I have provided my rough notes for this panel. \n \nOverall, I feel that my presence at this conference was important – particularly in terms of advancing the social justice agenda for counselling in Canada. I’m please to be part of this movement in its early phases.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».