MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2638325217

Stories from the field: narratives by practitioners from across Canada demonstrating the integration of social justice into counselling practice

2009· article· en· W2638325217 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sandra Collins

Bibliographic record

VenueAUSpace (Athabasca University) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling Practices and Supervision
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)Panel discussionAgency (philosophy)Public relationsEconomic JusticeNarrativePolitical scienceSocial justiceSocial workSociologyPedagogyMedicineSocial scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Workshop A was well attended, primarily by practitioners interested in how to engage in social justice activities as part of their private or agency practice. The ideas presented were positively received. Discussion focused on the systemic barriers for counsellors in terms of restrictions on their time, roles, and agency mandates. The powerpoint presentation is attached.
\n
\nWorkshop B was also well attended. This was a different group of individuals who were also interested in how counsellors can have a positive impact on the systems that create problems for their clients in the first place. Part of the purpose of this session was to profile the social justice chapter of the Canadian Counselling Association, of which I am now the president. There was considerable interest generated and a number of means for continuing the work of the chapter through the year were suggested. We will be following up on a number of those over the summer, including setting up a discussion forum for Canadian counsellors interested in social justice activities. The powerpoint presentation is attached.
\n
\nWorkshop C was a panel discussion that was not well attended, primarily due to scheduling alongside on of the keynote speakers for the conference. However, we did proceed with our panel discussion and included the small audience in that dialogue. This was a good opportunity to touch base with counsellor educators across the country and see what others see as the current issues and trends. My focus was on distance education, primarily from a social justice perspective. This is a timely discussion because there is a lot of misinformation and bias in professional regulatory circles related to distance education professional programs and I am trying to be proactive in addressing some of these concerns. There was no formal presentation; however, I have provided my rough notes for this panel.
\n
\nOverall, I feel that my presence at this conference was important – particularly in terms of advancing the social justice agenda for counselling in Canada. I’m please to be part of this movement in its early phases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAUSpace (Athabasca University)Same topicCounseling Practices and SupervisionFrench-language works237,207