MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2699766133 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.2934.2934

High Frequency of Somatic Mutations of KMT2D and CARD11 Genes in Cold Agglutinin Disease

2016· article· en· W2699766133 sur OpenAlexaff
Agnieszka Małecka, Gunhild Trøen, Anne Tierens, Ingunn Østlie, Jędrzej Małecki, Ulla Randen, Sigbjørn Berentsen, Geir E. Tjønnfjord, Jan Delabie

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBlood groups and transfusion
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyExomeSanger sequencingMissense mutationExome sequencingLymphoplasmacytic LymphomaSomatic evolution in cancerBone marrowGeneticsMutationCancer researchImmunologyGeneLymphomaWaldenstrom macroglobulinemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Primary cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a hemolytic anemia mediated by monoclonal anti-I autoantibodies. CAD is caused by an underlying low grade B-cell lymphoproliferative disease of the bone marrow with a typical histology that is different from lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and, accordingly, does not display the MYD88 L265P mutation (Randen et al., Haematologica, 2014). Since CAD is a clonal lymphoproliferative disorder, we studied the mutational landscape to further characterize the disease and identify potential novel treatment approaches. We prospectively collected bone marrow samples of CAD patients, enrolled in a clinical trial (CAD5; www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02689986). Exome sequencing of six cases was performed and findings were confirmed in ten additional cases using targeted sequencing. For these analyses, clonal B cells and normal T cells, used as control, were purified from bone marrow samples using fluorescent activated cell sorting. All mutations were verified by Sanger sequencing. Whole-exome sequencing was performed at BGI Tech Solutions (Hongkong) using the Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon V4 Reagent Kit and Illumina HiSeq technology. The bioinformatics pipeline consistent of BWA alignment tool (aligned to hg19); Picard tools FixMateInformation and MarkDuplicates; the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) IndelRealigner and BaseRecalibrator; somatic variant detection tools Strelka, MuTect and Pindel; the annotation tool SnpEff. Recurrent somatic mutations were found in KMT2D (11/16 cases, 69%) and CARD11 (5/16, 31%) (Table 1, Figure 1-2). 7/16 (44%) of KMT2D mutations were deemed high impact mutations by SnpEff and to result in inactive protein. 2/16 (12,5%) of KMT2D mutations are missense mutations and are predicted to impair SET domain function. 2/16 (12,5%) of KMT2D mutations are classified by SnpEff as low impact mutations of which functional tests are necessary to demonstrate potential consequences for protein function. Of interest, two additional patients showed rare germline KMT2D variants that have also been seen in Kabuki syndrome patients, although these patients do not have Kabuki syndrome. CARD11 was somatically mutated in 5/16 (31%) cases. Four of those patients had a concurrent KMT2D mutation. All CARD 11 mutations were classified as moderate impact mutations by SnpEff. Mutations were tightly clustered in a 20bp sequence of the coiled-coil domain sequence (Table 1, Figure 2). KMT2D is a histone lysine methyl transferase that represses B cell lymphoma development. Mono-allelic mutations of KMT2D seem to act in a dominant fashion and cause partial loss of protein expression with cell growth advantage. KMT2D is frequently mutated in follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma and nodal marginal zone lymphoma. Mono-allelic constitutional mutations cause Kabuki syndrome, characterized by distinct facial characteristics and multiple organ malformations. Patients frequently develop immune-mediated thrombocytopenia as well as auto-immune hemolytic anemia. CARD11 coiled-coil domain mutations result in constitutive NF-kB activation and enhanced NF-kB activity upon antigen receptor stimulation. Mutations were previously detected in diffuse large B cell lymphomas of activated B cell origin. Mono-allelic CARD11 coiled coil mutations are not oncogenic per se in mice and humans, but result in B-cell proliferation and auto-antibody production. Since four CAD patients showed concurrent KMT2D and CARD11 mutations, it seems likely that the mutations act in concert with anti-I B-cell receptor stimulation to contribute to CAD-associated lymphoproliferative disease. In conclusion, we demonstrated a high frequency of KMT2D and CARD11 mutations in the bone marrow B cell lymphoproliferative disease of patients with CAD. These results confirm that CAD-associated B cell lymphoproliferative disease is a distinct disease different from other known B cell lymphoproliferative diseases of the bone marrow, most notably lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. The identification of these recurrent mutations in CAD may allow the design of novel treatment modalities. Table 1 Mutations in KMT2D and CARD11 gene in CAD. Table 1. Mutations in KMT2D and CARD11 gene in CAD. Figure 1 Mutations within KMT2D gene and protein detected in CAD patients. Figure 1. Mutations within KMT2D gene and protein detected in CAD patients. Figure 2 Mutations within CARD11 protein detected in CAD patients. Figure 2. Mutations within CARD11 protein detected in CAD patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,167
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,164

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,221
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetBlood groups and transfusionTravaux en français237 207