Change and Continuity at the Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
When Professor Nico Stehr asked me to succeed him as editor of the Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie (CJS/CCS) I was both honoured and apprehensive. Established in 1975 by a group of five sociologists at the University of Alberta, the CJS/CCS is Canada's oldest exclusively sociological journal. Under Professor Stehr's excellent stewardship it emerged as a premiere publication venue for a wide range of sociological scholarship that is read globally and cited widely. My shelf contains a two-metre-long run of CJS/CCS volumes which serve to reinforce the major contribution that this publication has made to sociology in Canada and internationally. Professor Stehr also had the foresight in 1995 to establish the Canadian Journal of Sociology OnLine, a rarity in those early days of electronic publishing. Hence, I am intimately aware of the journal's high standards and history of innovation. At the same time, I also know that scholarly publishing in Canada is a precarious venture. This editorial presents my plans for the journal for the coming years and how I expect to meet these challenges. Before outlining the changes--some of which are quite significant--it is worth accentuating the attributes of the journal that I will jealously protect. Most fundamentally, all of the coming changes are motivated by a desire to ensure that the journal's reputation for excellent scholarship is maintained and advanced. There continues to be a demonstrated need for a quality generalist Canadian sociology journal; one that publishes rigorously peer-reviewed works from the entire spectrum of sociological thought and also from the interdisciplinary matrix that increasingly informs our scholarship. In terms of the journal's Canadian orientation, we will continue to strike a balance between encouraging works with an international focus while also publishing distinctively Canadian works. All publications will continue to appear in either of Canada's two official languages. With these continuities in mind, there is also an ambitious agenda for reform. Change is required for the good of the journal and the wider sociological community. Some of the transformations are internal housekeeping matters, but others are larger in scope. All are being undertaken in the best interests of the intellectual and public communities served by the Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie. The modifications listed below are presented in no particular order, although the most fundamental is mentioned last, as it deserves a more sustained explanation. 1. Attract a new generation of readers and contributors to the CJS/CCS. While the journal has an active readership, many of our subscribers are now of an older generation. Several changes are designed to bring a new cohort of sociologists and interdisciplinary scholars to the CJS/CCS. Renewal and reinvigoration is imperative for the long-term health of the journal. 2. Establish a formal governance structure. I have established a governance structure which includes a University of Alberta Executive Board which will offer input on the journal's operations. 3. Change the journal's academic style. Over the years the CJS/CCS developed its own in-house referencing style which, although familiar to some authors, is idiosyncratic and can make it difficult to format papers. Starting with the first volume in 2008 the journal will move to the Chicago Manual of Style. This will provide contributors with a familiar style and will also allow those individuals who use personal bibliographic software to effortlessly format or reformat their references for submissions to the journal. 4. Publish more book reviews in a more timely fashion. Professor Jim Conley of Trent University has generously agreed to be our new book review editor. In his work with the Canadian Journal of Sociology OnLine he has established a reputation for quickly processing book reviews to the benefit of reviewers and authors alike. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,012 | 0,031 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,032 | 0,023 |
| Communication savante | 0,031 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,012 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».