Dissociative symptoms are associated with neurocognitive dysfunction in patients with MDD
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction It is widely reported that persons with major depressive disorder (MDD) show impaired performance on cognitive functioning, including frontotemporally mediated cognitive functions. The presence of cognitive dysfunction among patients with dissociative symptoms in trauma-related disorders may contribute to poorer treatment outcomes. Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) frequently report dissociative symptoms. Here we investigate association of dissociative symptoms and neurocognitive dysfunction in patients with depression. We predicted that higher levels of dissociative symptoms among persons with MDD would be associated with lower scores on objective measures of frontotemporally mediated neurocognitive functions. Methods Patients who met DSM-V diagnostic criteria for a primary diagnosis of recurrent MDD were recruited. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) was administered to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. To assess dissociative symptoms participants completed the Multiscale Dissociation Inventory (MDI). Two groups of patients were selected and matched. One group consisted of 13 patients having MDD and dissociative symptoms and second group consisted of 12 patients having MDD only. To measure frontotemporally mediated cognitive functioning following tests were administered: Color Trails Test; Wisconsin Card Sorting Test; Conners’ Continuous Performance Test (CPT). To examine group differences on clinical and neuropsychological scores, two-tailed independent samples t-tests was performed. Results Group comparisons of performance on neuropsychological tests showed that participants with depression and dissociative symptoms performed worse on Color Trails Test Part 2 completion time, a measure of mental flexibility and processing speed. MDI depersonalization scores were correlated with measures of processing speed, mental flexibility and sustained attention. Specifically, Color Trails Test Part 2 scores were negatively correlated with depersonalization symptoms, where lower scores indicate slower completion time. Depersonalization symptoms on the MDI were also related to the CPT Hit Reaction Time Interstimulus Interval Change (a measure of vigilance), such that higher levels of depersonalization were related to better performance in a less active environment. Conclusions Our results suggest that dissociation is related to specific subtle impairments in neurocognitive functioning. Dissociative symptoms should ideally be assessed before treatment, as they may influence MDD treatment response. The findings point towards the need to further examine the impact of dissociation on functioning in patients with depression. Disclosure of interest The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».