MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2731857219

'Labours Not Her Own': Emma and the Invisible World

2017· article· en· W2731857219 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bharat Tandon

Notice bibliographique

RevueUEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLiterature Analysis and Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNarrativeCasualLiteratureHistoryVirtueFront (military)Quarter (Canadian coin)SightArtPhilosophyLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

INVISIBLE PEOPLE Although she died almost a quarter of a century before Poe published Purloined Letter, Austen knew all too well about the phenomenon of things being hidden in plain sight. Throughout her fiction, from the violent slapstick of the juvenilia to the scarcely less displaced and deranged world of the Sanditon fragment, one of the distinctive features of her narratives is their ability, in various ways, to make a virtue of indirectness and obliquity, to make the offstage, the unheard, the unseen--all the features that hover in that hinterland beyond the story in front of our eyes--register their presences in a reader's imagination. When Humberstall, in Rudyard Kipling's masterful short story Janeites, has trouble squaring his addiction to Austen's novels with the fact that was nothin' to 'em nor in 'em. Nothin' at all, believe me (741), he is touching on a quality that Austen's readers--both her staunchest admirers (like Kipling's soldiers, finding a meeting place in Jane amid the casual slaughter of trench warfare) and her detractors--have frequently noted, and found puzzling. Why, one might ask, do these novels keep readers coming back to them? Why do so many readers, both specialist and non-specialist, experience the sensation of ideas and possibilities crowding around them every time they do reread, when, as Humberstall suggests, what is right in front of us is often so comparatively spare in its content or its rendition? Of course, there's no way I could provide one all-encompassing answer, one Key to All Austenian Mythologies, in the space available to me--even if I wanted to. What I would like to do here, though, is to suggest some possible answers to that question, as I explore the different ways in which what's in the world of Emma, Austen's most stylistically imaginative and suggestive novel, also involves the ghostly presence of what lies beyond its immediate field of vision. Moreover, I'd like to suggest that the novel's particular invitation for readers to imagine its invisible worlds offers a model of how we might understand Austen's attitude to the very medium and form in which she works. To begin with, though, I would like to look at one of the most intriguing marginal presences in the novel, not least because it sheds a light on some of the long-running aesthetic and political arguments that have been made about the social reach of Austen's writing. My title comes from a famous passage in the 1714 version of Alexander Pope's The Rape of the Lock: the virtuoso set-piece at the end of canto 1, where Belinda's morning toilette is transfigured by Pope's mock-heroic style into the of a classical warrior: Now awful Beauty puts on all its Arms; The Fair each moment rises in her Charms, Repairs her Smiles, awakens every Grace, And calls forth all the Wonders of her Face; Sees by Degrees a purer Blush arise, And keener Lightnings quicken in her Eyes. The busy Sylphs surround their darling Care; These set the Head, and those divide the Hair, Some fold the Sleeve, whilst others plait the Gown; And Betty's praised for Labours not her own. (1:139-48) This passage, like the whole of The Rape of the Lock itself, is both beautifully absurd and deeply in tune with the subject that its style would seem to be exaggerating. After all, in a poem sending up an eighteenth-century battle of the sexes over the lost lock of Belinda's hair, the arming of the heroine with cosmetics might not be such a small matter (a famous British advertising campaign for Boots 17 in the late 1990s ran with the tag-line, It's not make-up--it's ammunition). The comedy of manners staged within the lines of Pope's verse also creates its own suggestive collisions of the visible with the invisible. Since this is a burlesque version of a classical epic, there need to be some traces of divine intervention in the human actions: Machinery, Madam, is a Term invented by the Criticks, to signify that Part which the Deities, Angels, or Daemons, are made to act in a Poem (217). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,110
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,373

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,207
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia)Même sujetLiterature Analysis and CriticismTravaux en français237 207