Bibliographic record
Abstract
Invisible PeopleAlthough she died almost a quarter of a century before Poe published 'The Purloined Letter', Jane Austen knew all too well about the phenomenon of things being hidden in plain sight.Throughout her fiction, from the violent slapstick of the juvenilia to the scarcely less displaced and deranged world of the Sanditon fragment, one of the distinctive features of her narratives is their ability, in various ways, to make a virtue of indirectness and obliquity, to make the offstage, the unheard, the unseenall the features that hover in that hinterland beyond the story in front of our eyes -register their presences in a reader's imagination as she reads.When Humberstall, in Rudyard Kipling's masterful short story "The Janeites", has trouble squaring his addiction to Austen's novels with the fact that "'there was nothin' to 'em nor in 'em.Nothin' at all, believe me,'" (741) he is touching on a quality that Austen's readers have frequently noted, and found puzzling: both her staunchest admirers (like Kipling's soldiers, finding a meeting place in 'Jane' amid the casual slaughter of trench warfare), and her detractors.Why, one might ask, do these novels keep readers coming back to them; why do so many readers, both specialist and nonspecialist, experience the sensation of ideas and possibilities crowding around them every time they do reread, when, as Humberstall suggests, what is right in front of us is often so comparatively spare in its content or its rendition?Of course, there's no way I could provide one all-encompassing answer, one Key to All Austenian Mythologies, in the space available to meeven if I wanted to, which I don't.What I would like to do here, though, is to suggest some possible answers to that question, as I explore the different ways in which "what's there" in the world of Emma (Austen's most stylistically imaginative and suggestive novel) also involves the ghostly presence of what lies beyond its immediate field of vision.Moreover, I'd like to suggest that the particular invitation that the novel makes for readers to imagine its invisible worlds offers a model of how we might understand Austen's attitude to the very medium and form in which she works.To begin with, though, I would like to look at one of the most intriguing marginal presences in the novel, not least because it sheds a light on some of the longrunning aesthetic and political arguments that have been made about the social 'reach' of Austen's writing.My title comes from a famous passage in the five-Canto 1714 version of Alexander Pope's The Rape of the Lock: the virtuoso set-piece at the end of Canto I, where the heroine Belinda's morning toilette is transfigured by Pope's mockheroic style into the arming of a classical warrior: Now awful Beauty puts on all its Arms; The Fair each moment rises in her Charms, Repairs her Smiles, awakens ev'ry Grace, And calls forth all the Wonders of her Face; Sees by degrees a purer Blush arise, And keener Lightnings quicken in her Eyes.The busy Sylphs surround their darling Care; These set the Head, and those divide the Hair, Some fold the Sleeve, whilst others plait the Gown; And Betty's praised for Labours not her own.(222-223)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".