Molotov, Malenkov, Kaganovich. 1957. Stenogramma Iiun'skogo Plenuma TsK KPSS I Drugie Dokumenty
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A.N. Iakovlev. Molotov, Malenkov, Kaganovich. 1957. Stenogramma iiun'skogo plenuma TsK KPSS i drugie dokumenty. Rossiia, XX vek, Dokumcnty. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnyi Fond Demokratiia, 1998. 843 pp. Cloth.Rarely do scholars of Russia and Soviet Union receive a gift like publication of Molotov, Malenkov, Kaganovich. 1957. Stenogramma iiun'skogo plenuma TsK KPSS I drugiye dokumenty. Part of a series devoted to Six Plenums of CPSU Central Committee after Stalin, it is an admirable collaborative effort on part of International Fund Demokratiia' (Russia) and Hoover Institute (USA).The volume is an extremely valuable contribution to study of Soviet Union and Russia. The publication of previously unpublished and unabridged archival materials offers exceptional insights into power crisis that shook CPSU Central Committee as well as methods with which it was handled.The description of events that led to july 1957 plenum, as well as proceedings of plenum itself, makes fascinating reading. On 18 june 1957, scheduled meeting of Presidium of Soviet of Ministers turned into an unexpected attack against first secretary of Communist party, N.S. Khrushchev. G.M. Malenkov and his group accused Khrushchev of a lack of collegiality, rudeness, and intolerance towards other members of Central Committee. But real reason for attack was threat to group posed by Khrushchev's promotion of his own cadres within party apparatus. V.M. Molotov, LM. Kaganovich, G.M. Malenkov, as well as four other members, voted to remove Khrushchev from power.Khrushchev, with assistance of MGB, came up with an unprecedented solution: Khrushchev's supporters from republics and regional party committees were urgently transported to Moscow by military aircraft. Their arrival resulted in Plenum of CPSU Central Committee that lasted from 22 to 29 june 1957 and signified a key step in political struggle with CPSU Central Committee and ultimate victory of Khrushchev over opposition.To general public, plenum was presented as a schism between major party line defended by Khrushchev and conspirators Malenkov, Molotov, and Kaganovich, who were slowing down de-Stalinization as well as rehabilitation of Stalinist victims after XX Congress of Communist Party. The documents of Plenum show that the old guard sabotaged these processes not because they had been directly implicated as eager and willing abettors of old order, but because of their personal loss of power, status, and economic benefits that accompanied new reforms. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».