Effect of Synthetic Cannabinoids in Older Adults
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editor: Use of recreational drugs, including synthetic cannabinoids receptor agonists (SCRAs), is increasing.1, 2 Synthetic cannabinoids, known as “k2” or “spice,” contain different chemical substances combined with herbal mixtures to produce cannabinoid-like effects.3 Emergency department (ED) visits have significantly increased as a result of SCRA abuse.2, 3 Abuse among older adults has not been reported. Four cases of older persons presenting for SCRA intoxication are described. A 67-year-old African-American man presented after an episode of syncope witnessed after he used SCRAs. Initial electrocardiogram (ECG) was remarkable for severe sinus bradycardia (37 beats per minute) (Figure 1). He was admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU), paced transcutaneously, and monitored. Urine toxicology was negative, and no other cause for bradycardia was identified in ancillary examination except for the use of SCRAs. He was discharged after a few days without any adverse events. His medical history was positive for hypertension, and all previous ECGs reviewed were normal. A 66-year-old African-American man presented with signs of intoxication, confusion, and vomiting after using SCRAs. His vital signs were normal. He received intravenous (IV) fluids and was discharged after his symptoms resolved. Urine toxicology was negative. A 71-year-old African-American woman presented with elbow pain after a fall. She reported smoking SCRAs, feeling dizzy, falling, and injuring both elbows. Vital signs were normal. IV fluids and pain medication were given, after which she was discharged from the ED. Urine toxicology was negative. A 66-year-old Hispanic male was brought to the ED after being found wandering and dizzy in the street. He reported having used SCRAs minutes before his symptoms started. Urine toxicology was negative. He stayed in ED under observation, received IV fluids, and was discharged with resolution of symptoms. SCRA abuse has increased and raised concern worldwide in the last few years.1, 2 People intoxicated with SCRAs have mainly neurological symptoms: altered mental status, agitation, hallucinations, seizures, and central nervous system (CNS) depression.3 Other side effects such as arrhythmia, hyperthermia, and cardiotoxicity have also been reported.2, 3 SCRAs have become popular because of their easy accessibility, low price, marijuana-like effects, and negative screening results using routine urine toxicological methods. There are several SCRAs, including JWH-018, JWH-073, and HU-210 that were developed for scientific purposes, but illicit laboratories and criminal organizations started to mix or spray them onto herbs for distribution.1-4 Older adults have been exposed to this drug. Of the four people described above, the most-affected required CCU admission for severe bradycardia requiring cardiac monitoring and transcutaneous pacing. No possible cause of bradycardia was identified, including electrolyte abnormalities; hypothyroidism; and use of beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and psychotropic medications that can potentially cause QT prolongation. There is lack of evidence concerning the use of cannabinoids specifically in older adults and limited evidence as to whether they can trigger cardiovascular events.5, 6 Endocannabinoids affect contractility and Ca+2 signaling through their affinity for the cannabinoid (CB) 1 and CB2 receptors. Information on the effects of SCRAs on the cardiovascular system is also limited, but they include hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, chest pain, QT prolongation, myocardial infarction, and cardiac arrest.7-9 Thus, the effect of SCRAs ranges from conduction abnormalities through CB receptors to myocardial depression. Their effects also involve blockage of Na+ channels and inhibition of Na+/Ca+2 exchangers.8, 9 Since the rise of SCRAs, there have been cases of younger individuals with life-threating conditions; a strong CNS depression described as “zombielike” behavior was recently reported in a group of intoxicated individuals in Brooklyn, New York.10 Important aspects of the older population are the presence of comorbid conditions, the number of medication combinations, and the normal age-related physiological changes that make some vulnerable to adverse effects to SCRAs, as well as any medication or toxin. Data regarding older adults intoxicated with SCRAs are limited, which is why this report is important. In addition to considering common causes of intoxication, clinicians need to be aware of this new designer drug and consider that an intoxicated older adult with a negative routine urinary toxicology screen may have used a SCRA, especially if SCRAs can easily be found in the community near the hospital. Because there are no routine tests for SCRAs, information that the individual; witnesses, including emergency medical services; and family members provide must be relied on. Conflict of Interest: The authors have no financial or any other kind of personal conflicts with this paper. Author Contributions: HR, EC, MR, CD: review of cases. HR: writing manuscript. GP, SC, GWH: editing manuscript. Sponsor's Role: None.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».