MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2756012063 · doi:10.1111/jgs.14998

Effect of Synthetic Cannabinoids in Older Adults

2017· letter· en· W2756012063 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hans A. Reyes, Eder H. Cativo, Marco Ruiz, Carissa Dumancas, Gerald Pekler, Shobhana Chaudhari, Getaw Worku Hassen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSociety for Community Research and ActionCanadian Geriatrics SocietyJohn A. Hartford Foundation
KeywordsMedicineBradycardiaVomitingEmergency departmentTramadolChest painVital signsSinus bradycardiaPsychomotor agitationSynthetic cannabinoidsAnesthesiaPediatricsInternal medicineBlood pressureHeart rateAnalgesicCannabinoidPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: Use of recreational drugs, including synthetic cannabinoids receptor agonists (SCRAs), is increasing.1, 2 Synthetic cannabinoids, known as “k2” or “spice,” contain different chemical substances combined with herbal mixtures to produce cannabinoid-like effects.3 Emergency department (ED) visits have significantly increased as a result of SCRA abuse.2, 3 Abuse among older adults has not been reported. Four cases of older persons presenting for SCRA intoxication are described. A 67-year-old African-American man presented after an episode of syncope witnessed after he used SCRAs. Initial electrocardiogram (ECG) was remarkable for severe sinus bradycardia (37 beats per minute) (Figure 1). He was admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU), paced transcutaneously, and monitored. Urine toxicology was negative, and no other cause for bradycardia was identified in ancillary examination except for the use of SCRAs. He was discharged after a few days without any adverse events. His medical history was positive for hypertension, and all previous ECGs reviewed were normal. A 66-year-old African-American man presented with signs of intoxication, confusion, and vomiting after using SCRAs. His vital signs were normal. He received intravenous (IV) fluids and was discharged after his symptoms resolved. Urine toxicology was negative. A 71-year-old African-American woman presented with elbow pain after a fall. She reported smoking SCRAs, feeling dizzy, falling, and injuring both elbows. Vital signs were normal. IV fluids and pain medication were given, after which she was discharged from the ED. Urine toxicology was negative. A 66-year-old Hispanic male was brought to the ED after being found wandering and dizzy in the street. He reported having used SCRAs minutes before his symptoms started. Urine toxicology was negative. He stayed in ED under observation, received IV fluids, and was discharged with resolution of symptoms. SCRA abuse has increased and raised concern worldwide in the last few years.1, 2 People intoxicated with SCRAs have mainly neurological symptoms: altered mental status, agitation, hallucinations, seizures, and central nervous system (CNS) depression.3 Other side effects such as arrhythmia, hyperthermia, and cardiotoxicity have also been reported.2, 3 SCRAs have become popular because of their easy accessibility, low price, marijuana-like effects, and negative screening results using routine urine toxicological methods. There are several SCRAs, including JWH-018, JWH-073, and HU-210 that were developed for scientific purposes, but illicit laboratories and criminal organizations started to mix or spray them onto herbs for distribution.1-4 Older adults have been exposed to this drug. Of the four people described above, the most-affected required CCU admission for severe bradycardia requiring cardiac monitoring and transcutaneous pacing. No possible cause of bradycardia was identified, including electrolyte abnormalities; hypothyroidism; and use of beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and psychotropic medications that can potentially cause QT prolongation. There is lack of evidence concerning the use of cannabinoids specifically in older adults and limited evidence as to whether they can trigger cardiovascular events.5, 6 Endocannabinoids affect contractility and Ca+2 signaling through their affinity for the cannabinoid (CB) 1 and CB2 receptors. Information on the effects of SCRAs on the cardiovascular system is also limited, but they include hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, chest pain, QT prolongation, myocardial infarction, and cardiac arrest.7-9 Thus, the effect of SCRAs ranges from conduction abnormalities through CB receptors to myocardial depression. Their effects also involve blockage of Na+ channels and inhibition of Na+/Ca+2 exchangers.8, 9 Since the rise of SCRAs, there have been cases of younger individuals with life-threating conditions; a strong CNS depression described as “zombielike” behavior was recently reported in a group of intoxicated individuals in Brooklyn, New York.10 Important aspects of the older population are the presence of comorbid conditions, the number of medication combinations, and the normal age-related physiological changes that make some vulnerable to adverse effects to SCRAs, as well as any medication or toxin. Data regarding older adults intoxicated with SCRAs are limited, which is why this report is important. In addition to considering common causes of intoxication, clinicians need to be aware of this new designer drug and consider that an intoxicated older adult with a negative routine urinary toxicology screen may have used a SCRA, especially if SCRAs can easily be found in the community near the hospital. Because there are no routine tests for SCRAs, information that the individual; witnesses, including emergency medical services; and family members provide must be relied on. Conflict of Interest: The authors have no financial or any other kind of personal conflicts with this paper. Author Contributions: HR, EC, MR, CD: review of cases. HR: writing manuscript. GP, SC, GWH: editing manuscript. Sponsor's Role: None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Geriatrics Society→Same topicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research→French-language works237,207→