PedsCases: A Learning Module for the Approach to Pediatric Vomiting
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction The resource file features two podcasts found on PedsCases: Pediatrics for Medical Students that aim to review an approach to pediatric vomiting, as well as supplemental material to enhance learning about the topic. The podcasts are intended for undergraduate medical students in their core pediatrics rotation and present an initial approach to the assessment and management of pediatric vomiting. The content is applicable to learners in the fields of pediatrics, family medicine, radiology, general surgery, and emergency medicine. Other attached resources include Word document copies of the script and supplemental study table from the podcasts. Methods The first podcast focuses on pathophysiology, common causes, and differential diagnosis of pediatric vomiting, including those specific to the neonatal period. The second podcast continues with a clinical approach to pediatric vomiting, including history taking, physical examination, investigations, and management. The podcasts provide a useful and practical approach to narrowing the broad differential diagnosis for pediatric vomiting. They also review both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal causes and identify red flag symptoms and signs that may signify a serious or life-threatening cause. A case example is presented at the start of the first podcast and is further explored and resolved to conclude and reinforce the teaching of the second podcast. Learning is further reinforced by working through the case example and answering its corresponding multiple-choice questions after listening to the two podcasts. PedsCases has been integrated into the undergraduate pediatric medical education curriculum at the University of Alberta and at other Canadian medical schools. It is one of the main sources recommended to students to cover the core objectives of the clinical pediatric rotation and to assist in preparing for the final examinations. Results The deployment of PedsCases has been empirically evaluated. Both cases and podcasts help medical students to achieve their desired learning objectives and improve student-assessed competency while cases improve student knowledge. Since 2008, PedsCases has had over 55,000 visitors from 150 countries with over 375,000 podcast downloads. PedsCases has published 14 previous learning modules in MedEdPORTAL. Discussion The content found on PedsCases.com is aligned with the Canadian National Undergraduate Curriculum in Pediatrics, which has been developed by the Pediatric Undergraduate Program Directors of Canada; thus, it is a key educational tool for pediatric educators and clerkship directors to use to complement the national curriculum and help learners to achieve the outlined competencies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».