PedsCases: A Learning Module for the Approach to Pediatric Vomiting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction The resource file features two podcasts found on PedsCases: Pediatrics for Medical Students that aim to review an approach to pediatric vomiting, as well as supplemental material to enhance learning about the topic. The podcasts are intended for undergraduate medical students in their core pediatrics rotation and present an initial approach to the assessment and management of pediatric vomiting. The content is applicable to learners in the fields of pediatrics, family medicine, radiology, general surgery, and emergency medicine. Other attached resources include Word document copies of the script and supplemental study table from the podcasts. Methods The first podcast focuses on pathophysiology, common causes, and differential diagnosis of pediatric vomiting, including those specific to the neonatal period. The second podcast continues with a clinical approach to pediatric vomiting, including history taking, physical examination, investigations, and management. The podcasts provide a useful and practical approach to narrowing the broad differential diagnosis for pediatric vomiting. They also review both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal causes and identify red flag symptoms and signs that may signify a serious or life-threatening cause. A case example is presented at the start of the first podcast and is further explored and resolved to conclude and reinforce the teaching of the second podcast. Learning is further reinforced by working through the case example and answering its corresponding multiple-choice questions after listening to the two podcasts. PedsCases has been integrated into the undergraduate pediatric medical education curriculum at the University of Alberta and at other Canadian medical schools. It is one of the main sources recommended to students to cover the core objectives of the clinical pediatric rotation and to assist in preparing for the final examinations. Results The deployment of PedsCases has been empirically evaluated. Both cases and podcasts help medical students to achieve their desired learning objectives and improve student-assessed competency while cases improve student knowledge. Since 2008, PedsCases has had over 55,000 visitors from 150 countries with over 375,000 podcast downloads. PedsCases has published 14 previous learning modules in MedEdPORTAL. Discussion The content found on PedsCases.com is aligned with the Canadian National Undergraduate Curriculum in Pediatrics, which has been developed by the Pediatric Undergraduate Program Directors of Canada; thus, it is a key educational tool for pediatric educators and clerkship directors to use to complement the national curriculum and help learners to achieve the outlined competencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".