Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the 21st century, 50 years later after Beer’s first publications on ‘Viable System Model’, the relevance of the tasks of increasing management efficiency of viable system (VS) and complex projects, including strategic and prioritized, is still high. In my article, using system and cybernetic approach, I examine basic properties of VS, including diversity and complexity. Relevance and significant difference of my research from the famous general reasoning about diversity and complexity of VS are that my article provides specific and meaningful description of analytical relations that evaluate a variety of control systems (CS) and the complexity of controllable system (CAS). Such constructive approach allows evaluating possibility of controlling complexity of VS instead of resource management (materials and machines, people, finances, etc.). This is particularly important for controlling (regulation) vital functions of active complex system and top-priority strategic projects. Assuming it is hardly possible sufficient correctly to define the meaning of term ‘diversity’ as applied to both any object and any system, and not trying to formulate universal and constructive definition, I presented definition of diversity of control (sub)system of complex active and purposeful systems, in particular, VS. viable system; complex active and purposeful system; diversity; complexity; similarity index; diversity index; control systems; controllable system; controlling complexity of viable system Ashby W.R. Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall, 1956. Bain C., Ransom E., Higgins V. Private Standards: Contestation, Hybridity and the Politics of Standards. Introduction to an Edited Collection of Articles in International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food1 (2013): 1–10. Bamberger M., Cheema S. Case Studies of Project Sustainability, Implications for Policy and Operations from Asian Experience. Washington, D.C.: Economic Development Institute, 1990. Batuev S.A., Volkova V.N., eds. System Analysis of the Economy and the Organization of Production. Leningrad: University of Technology Publisher, 1991. (In Russian). Beer S. Viable System Model: Its Provenance, Development, Methodology and Pathology. Journal of the Operational Research Society1 (1984): 7–25. Beer S. Designing Freedom. Toronto: CBC Learning Systems, 1974 Beer S. Diagnosing the System for Chichester, London and New York: John Wiley, 1985. Beer S. Heart of Enterprise. London and New York: John Wiley, 1979. Beer S. Platform for London and New York: John Wiley, 1975. Beer S. The Brain of the Firm. London: Penguin, 1972. Beer S. The Brain of the Firm. Moscow: Radio i svyaz Publisher, 1993. (In Russian). Biological Variety. Environmental Dictionary. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Publisher, 2001. Encyclopedias & Dictionaries. N.p., n.d. Web. . (In Russian). Black Box. Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. The Wikimedia Common, Inc., n. p. Web. . (In Russian). Buckl S., Matthes F., Schweda C.M.. Towards a Method Framework for Enterprise Architecture Management–A Literature Analysis from a Viable System Perspective. 5th International Workshop on Business/IT Alignment and Interoperability (BUSITAL 2010). 2010, рр. 46–60. Buslenko N.P. Modeling of Complex Moscow: Nauka Publisher, 1978. (In Russian). Chernyak Yu.I. Analysis and Synthesis of Systems in the Economy. Moscow: Ekonomika Publisher, 1970. (In Russian). Danilov-Daniliyan V.I., ed. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Economics and Mathematics. Moscow: Bolshaya Russkaya Entsiklopediya Publisher, INFRA-M Publisher, 2003. (In Russian). Delbridge R., Edwards T. Challenging Conventions: Roles and Processes during Non-isomorphic Institutional Change. Human Relations3 (2008): 299–325. Doktorovich A.B., Zimin I.N. Models of Viable System. Russian State and Socio-Economic Challenges of Our Time. Moscow: Prospekt Publisher, 2015, volume 1, pp. 729–739. (In Russian). Durability, Encyclopedias and Dictionaries: The Great Soviet Encyclopedia.p., n.d. Web. .In Russian). Durability. The Free Encyclopedia. The Wikimedia Commons, Inc., n.d. Web. . (In Russian). Durante M. What Model of Trust for Networked Cooperation? Online Social Trust in the Production of Common Goods (Knowledge Sharing). Living, Working and Learning Beyond Technology, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference Ethicomp. Mantova: University Press, 2008, pp. 211–223. Espejo R. Viable System Model. Systemic Practice and Action Research3 (1990): 219-221. Fleishman B.S. Elements of Theory of Complex Systems Potential Effectiveness. Moscow: Sovetskoe radio Publisher, 1971. (In Russian). Friedland B., Ransom E., Wolf S. Agrifood Alternatives and Reflexivity in Academic Practice. Rural Sociology4 (2010): 532–537. GOST 27.002-89: Industrial Product Dependability. State Standard. 1 July 1990. PDF-file. . (In Russian). Handy C. Understanding London: Penguin, 1993. Jackson M.C. Soul of the Viable System Model. Systemic Practice and Action Research5 (1992): 561–564. Leonard A. Viable System Model and Its Application to Complex Organizations. Systemic Practice and Action Research4 (2009): 223–233. Leonard A. Viable System Model and Knowledge Management. Kybernetes5/6 (2000): 710–715. Livshits V.N. System Analysis of Non-stationary Market Reform of the Russian Economy: 1992-2013. Moscow: LENAND Publisher 2013. (In Russian). Lopatnikov L.I. Economics and Mathematics Dictionary: Dictionary of Modern Economics. Moscow: Delo Publisher, 2003. (In Russian). Mondlane A.I. Behaviour Conceptual Modelling for Vulnerability and Risk Management Viable System Model Framework. International Journal of Intercultural Information Management1 (2012): 1–14. Murad R.S., Cavana R.Y. Applying the Viable System Model to ICT Project Management. International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies3 (2012): 186–205. Pettigrew A.M., Fenton E.M. Complexities and Dualities in Innovative Forms of The Innovating Organization. London: Sage, 2000, pp. 279–300. Prangishvili I.V. Systems Approach and System-wide Regularities. Moscow: SINTEG Publisher, 2000. (In Russian). Preece G., Shaw D., Hayashi H. Using the Viable System Model (VSM) to Structure Information Processing Complexity in Disaster Response. European Journal of Operational Research1 (2013): 209–218. Ransom E. Botswana’s Beef Global Commodity Chain: Explaining the Resistance to Change. Journal of Rural Studies4 (2011): 431–439. Ransom E. Rise of Agricultural Animal Welfare Standards as Understood Through a Neo-Institutional Lens. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food3 (2007): 26-44. Ransom E., Bain C. Gendering Agricultural Aid: An Analysis of Whether International Development Assistance Targets Women and Gender. Gender and Society1 (2011): 48–74. Ransom E., Wright W. Constructing Culinary Knowledge: Food and Agricultural Change in Community Cookbooks. Food, Culture & Society4 (2013): 669–689. Ranson S., Hinings B., Greenwood R. Structuring of Organizational Structures. Administrative Science Quarterly1 (1980): 1–17. Sadovsky V.N., Yudin E.G., eds. Studies on General Theory of Moscow: Progress Publisher, 1969. (In Russian). Schwaninger M. Stafford Beer (1926-2002). ProjectsISSS. N.p., October 2004. Web. . Thompson R., Laws A., Reilly D., Taleb-Bendiab A., Llewellyn-Jones D. A Set Theory Analysis of Ecological Dependence Amid an Agent Infrastructure in Beer’s Viable System Model through Viable Computer Systems. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence3 (2011): 188–196. Ushakov D.N. Explanatory Dictionary of the Modern Russian Language. Moscow: Adelant Publisher, 2013. (In Russian). Vidgen R. Cybernetics and Business Processes: the Viable System Model to Develop an Enterprise Process Architecture. Knowledge and Process Management2 (1998): 118–131. Weick K.E. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., 1969. Weick K.E. Enacted Sensemaking in Crisis Situation. Journal of Management Studies4 (1988): 305–317. Zimin I.N. On the Matter of Projects Durability and Viable Systems Formation. Proceedings of RAS Institute for Systems Analysis1 (2013): 16–29. (In Russian). Doktorovich, A. B. Diversity and Complexity of Viable System. Space and Time 3 (2015): 86–91. (In Russian). Fixed network address 2226-7271provr_st3-21.2015.25.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,011 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,048 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».