32: Age-Based Risk Factors for Cheerleading Injuries
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cheerleading has gradually become more important in Canada and represents an accessible way for youth to be physically active. To determine the differences in the injuries encountered by cheerleaders according to their age, in order to propose safety guidelines taking into account the developmental stages of children. Retrospective database review of cheerleading injuries extracted from the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP) database between 1990 and 2010. The injuries were compared by age group (5–9; 10–14; 15–19; 20 and over) according to their gender, mechanism, body part injured, nature and gravity. Overall, in 20 years, there were 1496 cases of injuries documented secondary to cheerleading (Median age 15, 4 (IQR=2, 2) years; The number of injuries reported increased by roughly 200% between 1990 and 2010. 1410 females [94%]). 2% of cases were 5-9 years old (Age Group-AG- 1), 40% were 10-14 (AG 2), 52% were 15-19 (AG 3) and 6% were 20 and over (AG 4). In AG 1, 2, and 3, girls were predominant while the gender ratio was close to 1:1 in AG 4. In AG1, injuries mainly occurred through tumbling while in the other groups stunts and projection skills were the ones involved. In all age groups, the upper limbs were the most injured, followed by the head and neck, and the lower limbs. Fractures were predominant in AG 1 (37%) and 2 (22%). However, sprains/strains were the most common injuries in AG 2, 3 and 4 with 29, 28, and 25% respectively. In all age groups, the injuries were in majority minor (requiring no follow-up). However, individuals in AG1 had a higher proportion of moderate (43%-requiring follow-up and treatment) and severe (3%-requiring admission and specific treatment) injuries. No fatalities were reported. Children's developmental stages affect their ability to participate in sports and the responses of their bodies to impact forces. Our findings concerning cheerleading injuries seem to indicate that younger children (5–9 years old) are more likely to suffer moderate to severe injuries. Thus, on a local basis the use of appropriate safety measures including safety mats, and spotters to catch falling athletes should be mandatory. On a national basis, Canadian Legislation should be emitted to standardize the approach to security in the practice of Cheerleading.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».