MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W276482246

Reflections on Feminist Activism within Two Distinct Universities: Timing and Location for Transformational Activities. (Reports/Rapports)

2001· article· en· W276482246 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Constance Backhause

Notice bibliographique

RevueResources for feminist research · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGender Diversity and Inequality
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHonourSociologyWhite (mutation)Media studiesHigher educationGender studiesLawHistoryPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Constance Backhause (1) This text is a slightly revised, written version of remarks delivered on September 29, 2000 at York University; on occasion of launch of York Stories: Women in Higher Education, edited by The York Stories Collective, and published in Toronto by TSAR Publications, 2000. ********** It is a great honour to help mark momentous launching of York Stories: Women in Higher Education, edited by The York Stories Collective. (2) This wonderful occasion takes me back, poignantly, to launch of Breaking Anonymity: The Chilly Climate for Women Faculty, some five years ago on November 4, 1995. (3) It was on that date, at University of Western Ontario in London, Ontario, that a group of authors, publishers and members of The Chilly Climate Collective gathered together to celebrate publication of our collection of essays and stories. At that time, we expressed our thanks to all of brave women who spoke about their oppressive experiences in academy. We thanked all courageous members of editorial collective who banded together to put their names on a volume that we feared might inspire backlash and defamation litigation. We even expressed our thanks to heterosexual, white, male administrators and faculty members who created chilly climate that inspired our writing. Without them, there would be no such books to write. In apt words of Kathryn Morgan, we reminded ourselves that we must never forget to acknowledge rutting struggles of antlered species. (4) On a much more serious note, we also spoke that night of many, many women and men whose accounts were not included in Breaking Anonymity publication. We spoke of those who were unable yet to speak or write about their experiences of discrimination within academy. We lamented that were not included in our collection out of fear of legal sanctions that would flow forth from those whose battle cry is freedom of speech. That evening I closed with an expression of hope that our book would do some small bit to break silence, to begin to redress shocking imbalances in our institutions, and to inspire many others to go far beyond our preliminary efforts. The spectacular efforts to break silence and preserve historical record of women's experiences at York University have gone way beyond what we hoped for and imagined might come in future. The contributions in York Stories take my breath away. The Breadth and Scope of York Stories This marvelous collection of edited transcripts and submissions goes well past what The Chilly Collective accomplished in Breaking Anonymity. Far more than we were able to do, York Stories confronts issues of intersectionality. The book brings a much-needed testament to a far broader range of oppressions -- race, gender, class, disability, age, sexual identity, anti-Semitism. More than we did, these accounts have also moved well beyond anonymity. Many of women students and faculty have bravely identified their stories with their full names. York Stories also takes us a step further towards articulating what we are demanding from our universities in way of concrete change. We dwelled more on devastation wrought by institutional failure. This book has itemized what would move academy forward: * lower tuition, and more financial support for students; * recognition that students with families, disabilities, and lives outside academy need specialized, flexible programming; * more meaningful courses that engage social justice issues more deeply; * smaller classes; * affirmative action programs that bring concrete results, measured by quantifiable numbers; * more faculty who embody diversity in their person as well as their teaching and research; * more safe spaces for meaningful dialogue, so that we create a university where only silences that reign embody productive listening not fear; * intellectual openness towards feminist, marxist, and anti-racist faculty members, in terms of teaching evaluations, tenure and promotion, and a supportive climate for their scholarly work; * awareness of appallingly high rates of cancer and immune disorders that overtake outsiders in academe as they suffer, in Nancy Nicol's words, the humiliation of clamouring at gate; (5) * efforts to correct tragic divisions between anti-sexist and antiracist activists; * complete debunking and rethinking of concept of academic freedom, that now uncritically and arrogantly parades itself through university corridors as a mere cloak for abusive practice. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,551
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,269
Tête enseignante GPT0,451
Écart entre enseignants0,182 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2001
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResources for feminist researchMême sujetGender Diversity and InequalityTravaux en français237 207