MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W276482246

Reflections on Feminist Activism within Two Distinct Universities: Timing and Location for Transformational Activities. (Reports/Rapports)

2001· article· en· W276482246 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Constance Backhause

Bibliographic record

VenueResources for feminist research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Diversity and Inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonourSociologyWhite (mutation)Media studiesHigher educationGender studiesLawHistoryPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Constance Backhause (1) This text is a slightly revised, written version of remarks delivered on September 29, 2000 at York University; on occasion of launch of York Stories: Women in Higher Education, edited by The York Stories Collective, and published in Toronto by TSAR Publications, 2000. ********** It is a great honour to help mark momentous launching of York Stories: Women in Higher Education, edited by The York Stories Collective. (2) This wonderful occasion takes me back, poignantly, to launch of Breaking Anonymity: The Chilly Climate for Women Faculty, some five years ago on November 4, 1995. (3) It was on that date, at University of Western Ontario in London, Ontario, that a group of authors, publishers and members of The Chilly Climate Collective gathered together to celebrate publication of our collection of essays and stories. At that time, we expressed our thanks to all of brave women who spoke about their oppressive experiences in academy. We thanked all courageous members of editorial collective who banded together to put their names on a volume that we feared might inspire backlash and defamation litigation. We even expressed our thanks to heterosexual, white, male administrators and faculty members who created chilly climate that inspired our writing. Without them, there would be no such books to write. In apt words of Kathryn Morgan, we reminded ourselves that we must never forget to acknowledge rutting struggles of antlered species. (4) On a much more serious note, we also spoke that night of many, many women and men whose accounts were not included in Breaking Anonymity publication. We spoke of those who were unable yet to speak or write about their experiences of discrimination within academy. We lamented that were not included in our collection out of fear of legal sanctions that would flow forth from those whose battle cry is freedom of speech. That evening I closed with an expression of hope that our book would do some small bit to break silence, to begin to redress shocking imbalances in our institutions, and to inspire many others to go far beyond our preliminary efforts. The spectacular efforts to break silence and preserve historical record of women's experiences at York University have gone way beyond what we hoped for and imagined might come in future. The contributions in York Stories take my breath away. The Breadth and Scope of York Stories This marvelous collection of edited transcripts and submissions goes well past what The Chilly Collective accomplished in Breaking Anonymity. Far more than we were able to do, York Stories confronts issues of intersectionality. The book brings a much-needed testament to a far broader range of oppressions -- race, gender, class, disability, age, sexual identity, anti-Semitism. More than we did, these accounts have also moved well beyond anonymity. Many of women students and faculty have bravely identified their stories with their full names. York Stories also takes us a step further towards articulating what we are demanding from our universities in way of concrete change. We dwelled more on devastation wrought by institutional failure. This book has itemized what would move academy forward: * lower tuition, and more financial support for students; * recognition that students with families, disabilities, and lives outside academy need specialized, flexible programming; * more meaningful courses that engage social justice issues more deeply; * smaller classes; * affirmative action programs that bring concrete results, measured by quantifiable numbers; * more faculty who embody diversity in their person as well as their teaching and research; * more safe spaces for meaningful dialogue, so that we create a university where only silences that reign embody productive listening not fear; * intellectual openness towards feminist, marxist, and anti-racist faculty members, in terms of teaching evaluations, tenure and promotion, and a supportive climate for their scholarly work; * awareness of appallingly high rates of cancer and immune disorders that overtake outsiders in academe as they suffer, in Nancy Nicol's words, the humiliation of clamouring at gate; (5) * efforts to correct tragic divisions between anti-sexist and antiracist activists; * complete debunking and rethinking of concept of academic freedom, that now uncritically and arrogantly parades itself through university corridors as a mere cloak for abusive practice. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0310.014
Scholarly communication0.0150.011
Open science0.0020.014
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.269
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResources for feminist researchSame topicGender Diversity and InequalityFrench-language works237,207