MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2766043030

High-throughput approaches to genome-wide analysis of genetic variation in polyploid wheat

2012· article· en· W2766043030 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eduard Akhunov, Sherry Chao, Cyrille Saintenac, S. Poormohammad Kiani, Deven R. See, Gina Brown‐Guedira, Mark E. Sorrells, Alina Akhunova, Jorge Dubcovsky, Colin Cavanagh, Matthew Hayden

Notice bibliographique

RevueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSawflyBiologyAgronomyPEST analysisDiamondback mothInfestationIntegrated pest managementBromus tectorumCultivarEcologyBotanyLepidoptera genitaliaPlutella
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Can. J. Plant Sci. Downloaded from pubs.aic.ca by Calif Dig Lib - Davis on 06/26/13 For personal use only. 596 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE specialized multitrophic pest complexes whose members interact in both positive and negative ways. In this context, management recommendations based on the traditional single-species pest control paradigm may lead to undesirable outcomes. Our goal was to evaluate a modeling framework to make multi-pest management decisions that take into account the existence of direct and indirect interactions among pests belonging to different trophic levels. We adopted a Bayesian decision theory approach in combination with path analysis to evaluate interactions between Bromus tectorum (cheat- grass), Fusarium crown rot, and Cephus cinctus (wheat stem sawfly). We assessed the joint response of these pests to seeding rates, cultivar competitiveness, and cultivar wheat stem sawfly tolerance. Results indicate that yield differences can be more readily explained as a result of the effects of management on pests and multi- pest interactions, rather than just by the direct effect of any particular management scheme on yield. For example, wheat stem sawfly tolerant varieties should be planted at a low seeding rate under high insect pressure. However, this variety should be replaced by a compe- titive and drought tolerant cultivar at high seeding rates as B. tectorum levels increase, despite the persisting wheat stem sawfly infestation. Also, the incidence of Fusarium can be explained by the abundance of B. tectorum, an alternative host for this disease. Our research suggests a framework for establishing a balance between model simplicity and the complexity of the process being modeled. High-throughput approaches to genome-wide analysis of genetic variation in polyploid wheat. E. Akhunov 1 *, S. Chao 2 , C. Saintenac 2 , S. Kiani 2 , D. See 3 , G. Brown- Guedira 4 , M. Sorrells 5 , A. Akhunova 6 , J. Dubcovsky 7 , C. Cavanagh 8 , and M. Hayden 9 . 1 Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA; 2 USDA-ARS Biosciences Research Laboratory, Fargo, ND, USA; 3 USDA Western Regio- nal Small Grains Genotyping Lab, Johnson Hall, WSU, Pullman, WA, USA; 4 USDA-ARS Eastern Regional Small Grains Genotyping Lab., 4114 Williams Hall, NCSU, Raleigh, NC, USA; 5 Plant Breeding & Genetics, Cornell University, NY, USA; 6 Integrated Genomics Facility, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA; 7 Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA; 8 CSIRO, Food Futures National Research Flagship, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; and 9 Department of Primary Industries Victoria, Victorian AgriBiosciences Center, 1 Park Drive, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia. Genome-wide analysis of genetic variation is a powerful tool for detecting marker-trait associations in diversity panels and mapping populations. Genome scale geno- typing data can be generated using high-throughput assays capable of detecting allelic variation in a pre- defined set of SNP loci or by direct sequencing. The combined effort of several research groups in collaboration with the International Wheat SNP Work- ing Group developed high-throughput SNP genotyping assays based on the Illumina iSelect platform. The assay was used to genotype 12 000 wheat lines including cultivars, landraces, wild relatives and the progeny of several mapping populations. Out 9000 SNP assays 95% produced high-quality genotype calls with up to 70% being polymorphic in a diverse sample of wheat cultivars with a minor allele frequency 0.05. Two high-density genetic maps based on SynOp and 4- way MAGIC populations were developed. An alterna- tive approach to SNP detection relies on next-generation sequencing technologies for direct sequencing of complexity reduced genomic libraries prepared either by restriction digestion or by selective capture of genomic regions of interest. These sequence-based genotyping approaches demonstrated high efficiency for detecting allelic variation in the wheat genome. The applicability of iSelect assay and genotyping-by- sequencing approaches for the analysis of genetic variation and genotype-phenotype relationships in wheat will be presented. Overview and progress of the CTAG project. C. McCartney 1 , C. Pozniak 2 , A. Sharpe 3 , R. MacLachlan 3 , P. Hucl 3 , M. Jordan 3 , R. Knox 4 , H. Randhawa 5 , D. Spaner 6 , F. Bekkaoui 6 , V. Galushko 7 , and R. Gray 8 . 1 AAFC-Cereal Research Centre, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; 2 Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK; 3 Plant Biotechnology Institute, National Research Council of Canada, Saska- toon, Saskatchewan, Canada; 4 AAFC-Semiarid Prairie Agricultural Research Centre, Box 1030, Swift Current, Saskatchewan, Canada; 5 AAFC-Lethbridge Research Centre, 5403 1st Ave South, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada; 6 Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 4-16D Agri- culture/Forestry Ctr, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Economics, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada; and Department of Bioresource Policy, Business & Econom- ics, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. The Canadian Triticum Advancement through Geno- mics (CTAG) project aims to provide genetic informa- tion and tools for the improvement of molecular breeding in wheat. The project has four major activities: (1) generating the first complete sequence of chromo- some 6D, (2) capturing and sequencing genomic coding sequences from Canadian wheat varieties, (3) identify- ing, validating, and mapping SNP markers in Canadian wheat germplasm, and (4) examination of the role of public-private partnerships in wheat genomics and breeding (GE3LS research). Sequencing of chromosome 6D will be done on a BAC by BAC basis, as agreed

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,013

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0020,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,197
Écart entre enseignants0,161 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueeScholarship (California Digital Library)→Même sujetWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology→Travaux en français237 207→