High-throughput approaches to genome-wide analysis of genetic variation in polyploid wheat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Can. J. Plant Sci. Downloaded from pubs.aic.ca by Calif Dig Lib - Davis on 06/26/13 For personal use only. 596 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE specialized multitrophic pest complexes whose members interact in both positive and negative ways. In this context, management recommendations based on the traditional single-species pest control paradigm may lead to undesirable outcomes. Our goal was to evaluate a modeling framework to make multi-pest management decisions that take into account the existence of direct and indirect interactions among pests belonging to different trophic levels. We adopted a Bayesian decision theory approach in combination with path analysis to evaluate interactions between Bromus tectorum (cheat- grass), Fusarium crown rot, and Cephus cinctus (wheat stem sawfly). We assessed the joint response of these pests to seeding rates, cultivar competitiveness, and cultivar wheat stem sawfly tolerance. Results indicate that yield differences can be more readily explained as a result of the effects of management on pests and multi- pest interactions, rather than just by the direct effect of any particular management scheme on yield. For example, wheat stem sawfly tolerant varieties should be planted at a low seeding rate under high insect pressure. However, this variety should be replaced by a compe- titive and drought tolerant cultivar at high seeding rates as B. tectorum levels increase, despite the persisting wheat stem sawfly infestation. Also, the incidence of Fusarium can be explained by the abundance of B. tectorum, an alternative host for this disease. Our research suggests a framework for establishing a balance between model simplicity and the complexity of the process being modeled. High-throughput approaches to genome-wide analysis of genetic variation in polyploid wheat. E. Akhunov 1 *, S. Chao 2 , C. Saintenac 2 , S. Kiani 2 , D. See 3 , G. Brown- Guedira 4 , M. Sorrells 5 , A. Akhunova 6 , J. Dubcovsky 7 , C. Cavanagh 8 , and M. Hayden 9 . 1 Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA; 2 USDA-ARS Biosciences Research Laboratory, Fargo, ND, USA; 3 USDA Western Regio- nal Small Grains Genotyping Lab, Johnson Hall, WSU, Pullman, WA, USA; 4 USDA-ARS Eastern Regional Small Grains Genotyping Lab., 4114 Williams Hall, NCSU, Raleigh, NC, USA; 5 Plant Breeding & Genetics, Cornell University, NY, USA; 6 Integrated Genomics Facility, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA; 7 Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA; 8 CSIRO, Food Futures National Research Flagship, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; and 9 Department of Primary Industries Victoria, Victorian AgriBiosciences Center, 1 Park Drive, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia. Genome-wide analysis of genetic variation is a powerful tool for detecting marker-trait associations in diversity panels and mapping populations. Genome scale geno- typing data can be generated using high-throughput assays capable of detecting allelic variation in a pre- defined set of SNP loci or by direct sequencing. The combined effort of several research groups in collaboration with the International Wheat SNP Work- ing Group developed high-throughput SNP genotyping assays based on the Illumina iSelect platform. The assay was used to genotype 12 000 wheat lines including cultivars, landraces, wild relatives and the progeny of several mapping populations. Out 9000 SNP assays 95% produced high-quality genotype calls with up to 70% being polymorphic in a diverse sample of wheat cultivars with a minor allele frequency 0.05. Two high-density genetic maps based on SynOp and 4- way MAGIC populations were developed. An alterna- tive approach to SNP detection relies on next-generation sequencing technologies for direct sequencing of complexity reduced genomic libraries prepared either by restriction digestion or by selective capture of genomic regions of interest. These sequence-based genotyping approaches demonstrated high efficiency for detecting allelic variation in the wheat genome. The applicability of iSelect assay and genotyping-by- sequencing approaches for the analysis of genetic variation and genotype-phenotype relationships in wheat will be presented. Overview and progress of the CTAG project. C. McCartney 1 , C. Pozniak 2 , A. Sharpe 3 , R. MacLachlan 3 , P. Hucl 3 , M. Jordan 3 , R. Knox 4 , H. Randhawa 5 , D. Spaner 6 , F. Bekkaoui 6 , V. Galushko 7 , and R. Gray 8 . 1 AAFC-Cereal Research Centre, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; 2 Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK; 3 Plant Biotechnology Institute, National Research Council of Canada, Saska- toon, Saskatchewan, Canada; 4 AAFC-Semiarid Prairie Agricultural Research Centre, Box 1030, Swift Current, Saskatchewan, Canada; 5 AAFC-Lethbridge Research Centre, 5403 1st Ave South, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada; 6 Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 4-16D Agri- culture/Forestry Ctr, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Economics, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada; and Department of Bioresource Policy, Business & Econom- ics, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. The Canadian Triticum Advancement through Geno- mics (CTAG) project aims to provide genetic informa- tion and tools for the improvement of molecular breeding in wheat. The project has four major activities: (1) generating the first complete sequence of chromo- some 6D, (2) capturing and sequencing genomic coding sequences from Canadian wheat varieties, (3) identify- ing, validating, and mapping SNP markers in Canadian wheat germplasm, and (4) examination of the role of public-private partnerships in wheat genomics and breeding (GE3LS research). Sequencing of chromosome 6D will be done on a BAC by BAC basis, as agreed
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".