Ground Motions of the December 2015 M 4.7 Vancouver Island Earthquake: Attenuation and Site Response
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Research Article| September 26, 2017 Ground Motions of the December 2015 M 4.7 Vancouver Island Earthquake: Attenuation and Site Response Frederick Jackson; Frederick Jackson aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Sheri Molnar; Sheri Molnar aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Hadi Ghofrani; Hadi Ghofrani aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Gail M. Atkinson; Gail M. Atkinson aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar John F. Cassidy; John F. Cassidy bNatural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada, P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada V8L 4B2 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Karen Assatourians Karen Assatourians aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Frederick Jackson aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Sheri Molnar aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Hadi Ghofrani aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Gail M. Atkinson aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca John F. Cassidy bNatural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada, P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada V8L 4B2 Karen Assatourians aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 27 Sep 2017 Online Issn: 1943-3573 Print Issn: 0037-1106 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2017) 107 (6): 2903–2916. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170071 Article history First Online: 27 Sep 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Frederick Jackson, Sheri Molnar, Hadi Ghofrani, Gail M. Atkinson, John F. Cassidy, Karen Assatourians; Ground Motions of the December 2015 M 4.7 Vancouver Island Earthquake: Attenuation and Site Response. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2017;; 107 (6): 2903–2916. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170071 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of the Seismological Society of America Search Advanced Search Abstract The December 2015 moment magnitude (M) 4.7 Vancouver Island earthquake is one of the largest recorded inslab earthquakes within Georgia Strait, British Columbia, Canada. Ground motions from all seismic stations within 500 km from the epicenter are examined. Peak ground acceleration reached a maximum of 4.65%g in Greater Victoria. We compare the observed horizontal‐component 5% damped pseudospectral acceleration (PSA) values with the inslab ground‐motion prediction equation (GMPE) suite used in the 2015 National Building Code of Canada (NBCC). PSA values from this event are significantly lower than the expected 2015 NBCC values for an M 4.7 inslab event, highlighting poor GMPE scaling at this low magnitude level. We develop an event‐specific GMPE to constrain the source and attenuation parameters in comparison with seismological models. Potential site effects are examined at strong‐motion stations within 85 km of the epicenter. High amplification at 4–6 Hz is observed on both thick sediment sites and on the northern edge of the Fraser delta, as observed in previous earthquakes. Gross generalizations of observed variable earthquake shaking are captured by current regional seismic microzonation maps; however, local discrepancies are present. This earthquake generated the first borehole array recordings obtained at depth in British Columbia. Recorded motions increase toward the surface and are of similar or higher amplitude than at nearby surface stations. Amplification between top and bottom sensors is a consistent factor of 7–8 in all three arrays over a similar 40–45‐m depth interval of Fraser delta sediments. Cross‐correlation analysis determines shear‐wave velocity estimates less than 350 m/s consistent with these delta sediments. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».