MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768236454 · doi:10.1785/0120170071

Ground Motions of the December 2015 M 4.7 Vancouver Island Earthquake: Attenuation and Site Response

2017· article· en· W2768236454 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Frederick Andrew Jackson, Sheri Molnar, Hadi Ghofrani, Gail M. Atkinson, J. F. Cassidy, K. Assatourians

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Seismological Society of America · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaGeological Survey of CanadaWestern University
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSeismologyGeologyAttenuationGround motionGeodesyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| September 26, 2017 Ground Motions of the December 2015 M 4.7 Vancouver Island Earthquake: Attenuation and Site Response Frederick Jackson; Frederick Jackson aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Sheri Molnar; Sheri Molnar aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Hadi Ghofrani; Hadi Ghofrani aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Gail M. Atkinson; Gail M. Atkinson aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar John F. Cassidy; John F. Cassidy bNatural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada, P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada V8L 4B2 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Karen Assatourians Karen Assatourians aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Frederick Jackson aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Sheri Molnar aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Hadi Ghofrani aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Gail M. Atkinson aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca John F. Cassidy bNatural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada, P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada V8L 4B2 Karen Assatourians aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7, smolnar8@uwo.ca Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 27 Sep 2017 Online Issn: 1943-3573 Print Issn: 0037-1106 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2017) 107 (6): 2903–2916. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170071 Article history First Online: 27 Sep 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Frederick Jackson, Sheri Molnar, Hadi Ghofrani, Gail M. Atkinson, John F. Cassidy, Karen Assatourians; Ground Motions of the December 2015 M 4.7 Vancouver Island Earthquake: Attenuation and Site Response. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2017;; 107 (6): 2903–2916. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170071 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of the Seismological Society of America Search Advanced Search Abstract The December 2015 moment magnitude (M) 4.7 Vancouver Island earthquake is one of the largest recorded inslab earthquakes within Georgia Strait, British Columbia, Canada. Ground motions from all seismic stations within 500 km from the epicenter are examined. Peak ground acceleration reached a maximum of 4.65%g in Greater Victoria. We compare the observed horizontal‐component 5% damped pseudospectral acceleration (PSA) values with the inslab ground‐motion prediction equation (GMPE) suite used in the 2015 National Building Code of Canada (NBCC). PSA values from this event are significantly lower than the expected 2015 NBCC values for an M 4.7 inslab event, highlighting poor GMPE scaling at this low magnitude level. We develop an event‐specific GMPE to constrain the source and attenuation parameters in comparison with seismological models. Potential site effects are examined at strong‐motion stations within 85 km of the epicenter. High amplification at 4–6 Hz is observed on both thick sediment sites and on the northern edge of the Fraser delta, as observed in previous earthquakes. Gross generalizations of observed variable earthquake shaking are captured by current regional seismic microzonation maps; however, local discrepancies are present. This earthquake generated the first borehole array recordings obtained at depth in British Columbia. Recorded motions increase toward the surface and are of similar or higher amplitude than at nearby surface stations. Amplification between top and bottom sensors is a consistent factor of 7–8 in all three arrays over a similar 40–45‐m depth interval of Fraser delta sediments. Cross‐correlation analysis determines shear‐wave velocity estimates less than 350 m/s consistent with these delta sediments. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaSame topicSeismic Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207