Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aquinas (ca. 1225-1274) earned the title Doctor Angelicas from his students' admiration for the treatise on angels in his monumental Summa Theologiae. More recently, he has merited the title Doctor Communis for the powerful influence his theological and philosophical works have exerted, not only on Roman Catholic scholarship, but also across a broad spectrum of Christian faith communities. Despite a temporary lapse in Thomistic studies during the years after Vatican II, the twentieth century witnessed the rediscovery of Aquinas in his historical context, beginning with the work of Martin Grabmann, M.-D. Chenu, O.P., Etienne Gilson, the Dominican schools of Saulchoir in France and Blackfriars Hall in Oxford, the Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies in Toronto, as well as the work of the Lutheran scholar Per Erik Persson, and the Reformed theologian Arvin Vos, to name only a handful.1 These scholarly endeavors have continued to bear fruit in the first decade of the new century, with several biographical studies and a number of new investigations into Aquinas s theological method and the historical setting of his work. It is the intention of this review article to survey some of these publications, highlighting their distinctive contributions to the field of Aquinas studies, thereby making them more accessible to the nonspecialist. In the past year, several introductory biographies have appeared in English both in Great Britain and in the United States. Foremost among these is a translation from the French by Paul J. Philibert, O.P., of M.-D. Chenu's St. d'Aquin et la theologie, first published in Paris in 1959 (English title: Aquinas and his Role in Theology [Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press, 2002]). Following the completion of his doctorate in Rome in 1920, Chenu (1895-1990) was appointed professor at the Dominican house of studies called le Saulchoir, and rapidly distinguished himself in the nascent discipline of medieval studies. He led the way among Roman Catholic scholars in the application of historical method to the study of Aquinas, but also involved himself in worker-priest activities and the Young Christian Worker movement,2 all of which rendered him suspect in the eyes of more conservative churchmen during the 1950s. Philibert s choice of Aquinas and his Role in Theology to reintroduce Chenu's contribution into the contemporary study of Aquinas is particularly apt, since it was originally written with a view to introducing Aquinas to young men and women of the working class, by making an exciting story of the saint's life, and explaining the theological principles of his thought in clear and simple terms. Philibert's translation is equally clear and eminently readable, and includes numerous black-and-white illustrations that convey a vivid sense of the visual appearance of Aquinas s world in art, architecture, and samples of the saints own near-illegible script. Aidan Nichols, O.P., is one of Britain's most distinguished Roman Catholic theologians, specializing in Thomistic studies. Like Chenu, he offers a guide to Aquinas for the beginner, Discovering Aquinas: An Introduction to his Life, Work, and Influence (London: Darton, Longman, and Todd, 2002). The first chapter, Thomas in his Time, describes the brief and busy life of Aquinas in the context of thirteenth-century academic and political life. Nichols then addresses key themes in Aquinas s theological works, including revelation, God and creation, the Trinity, the image of the Trinity in the human person, angelology, grace, the virtues, Christ, the church, and the sacraments. His style is conversational in tone, and he packs astonishing quantities of information into a clear and readable presentation. He devotes a single, transitional chapter to Aquinas's legacy in history, after which he concludes with chapters describing Aquinas s practice of philosophy and his method in theology. As with Chenu, the reader is left with a sense of the deep affection and enthusiasm which still inspires in the hearts of his modem Dominican brethren. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».